Independent Media Centre Ireland     http://www.indymedia.ie

Freedom of speech again attacked in Dail

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Wednesday October 23, 2002 11:03author by OK - SP

Today proposals have been made to restrict the rights of the newly formed 'Technical Group' (made up of 22 TDs from GP, SF, SP, and Inds). The proposals also reduce time the Taoiseach has to spend in Dáil.

Today the Government have proposed that the rights of the newly formed Technical Group be reduced. This groups formed for the perposes of more Dáil time etc.

The group has more TDs than the Labour Party. The Labour PArty are now going to support the governments attempts to shut up the real opposition. I hink this exposes what the Labour Party are now like. They are a bunch of careerists that do not like the way they've lost the limelight.

The attacks on the Technical Group shows that the Dail is really a bourgeois parlaiment. The rules are used to restrict those opposed to the status quo and the cosy consensus

Comments (8 of 8)

Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
author by Justin Moran - Sinn Feinpublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:16author email maigh_nuad at yahoo dot comauthor address author phone


Labour collaborators passed it amongst much waving and shouting and screaming and calling of names. You've never seen a more smug, self-satisfied group of Labour hacks in your life :)

author by Maurapublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:48author address author phone

It's very simple. Speaking time should be allocated in proportion to the number of members. When the technical group was set up (including Michael Lowry) it had 22 members while Labour have 21. Does anyone believe that the group, a "party", is the third largest party in the Dail? If the smaller parties were allowed to have party status in their own right none of this stuff would be necessary. Joe Higgins and Michael "Extension" Lowry are not in the same political party. If the group got to speak first and for longer that would mean Lowry, or any of the independents, would be recognised as the second opposition to the government.

THAT's undemocratic.

author by Daithipublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 13:15author address author phone

I haven't seen the transcript so could some tell me, was the reduction in Bertie-time and the change about the Technical Group part of the same plan? It won't go on the web until later or tomorrow (hey, we live in the NOW world...)

Something seems a little fishy about all this. And what Maura says is true but everyone (i.e. the non-Blueshirt opposition) should have refused to deal with the Dail's business until the party recognition rules were changed and it's a disgrace that a party of six deputies is forced to engage in this sham of a technical group. The WP had to do the same thing at one stage and it's not a viable solution.

author by Eamon the Anarchistpublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 13:48author address author phone

Maybe the SP, Greens and others are finally waking up to reality. At one stage 4 TDs were required to get recognised as a group and have speaking time guaranteed. At the time the WP had 2 TDs. Then they got 4 elected in 1987. The rules were changed again and a group was deemed to be 7. They got 7 in 1989. This made certain people in the Dail (Labour in particular) very angry. Dick Spring and Ruairi Quinn made it their mission to destroy the WP. We all know what happened next...

As Ken Livingstone said, If voting changed anything they'd abolish it.

author by Andrewpublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 16:53author address author phone

From the 1850s onwards, against a background of great new wealth in society and a working class that was more independent and resourceful, the 'problem of democracy' became urgent for the rich and powerful. In general wealth was rising throughout society, but so was the greed of those who owned the new factories, mines and plantations. The key question was: what was to be done about the general demand for democracy, and about the incessant clamour for political rights which, during the revolutions of 1848, had almost got completely out of hand?

Maintaining their privilege and wealth while generally conceding a semblance of democracy was the principal aim of the 'rich and privileged' during the second half of the 19th century. Parliament is a means of diffusing democracy, of channelling real struggles into a safe dead-end. Time and time again it has become a graveyard for the workers' movement.

Read on at the link below

Related Link: http://struggle.ws/once/pd_intro.html
author by OK - SPpublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 17:04author address author phone

I've no illusions in the Dáil. They make up their own rules in that fucking place.

They will change the rules as it suits them. Joe Higgins was suspended for a month for demanding the right to speak at the time of Nice Treaty I. They introduced the rule that 7 TDs are needed, that was something that could not be changed, even though 3 of the 5 opposition parties have under 7 TDs. However all of a sudden with the help of the "Labour" Party the rules have been changed to block the Technical Group.

The Dail and the position of TD gives revolutionaries an excellant platform. I think it's ultra leftist to agrue against running for Parliamentry positions.

author by jakpublication date Wed Oct 23, 2002 23:30author address author phone

Parliament doesn't exist if that's the case!

author by hold your firepublication date Thu Oct 24, 2002 23:42author address author phone

Lets take the labour shits advice and get them in 4 years time, lets target any marginal labour seat and expose the fake rabbit labour party. Hopefully working class people will see through the sell outs and they will only get blueshirt transfers



Indymedia Ireland is a media collective. We are independent volunteer citizen journalists producing and distributing the authentic voices of the people. Indymedia Ireland is an open news project where anyone can post their own news, comment, videos or photos about Ireland or related matters.