Joeys overtretched

by pat c Sun Mar 02, 2003 19:16

Seeing as the SP have been busy slandering me elsewhere, perhaps I'll get the 1st comment in here.

THe Airport Police, a fine body of men & women. Good proletarians to a person as far as the SP are concerned. Indeed the SP expect this vanguard to take strike action against US Warplanes.

What do the SP base this on?

Could it be the numerous cases where the AP have assaulted, bullied and haerrassed anti war activists and independent journalist?

Maybe its because the AP were in the fire tenders yesterday with the water cannon and were ready to use them on GNAW.

Actually its gone beyond a joke:

WHEN WILL THE SP CONDEMN THE ACTIVITIES OF THE AIRPORT POLICE?

by KaM - LSP (CWI) Sun Mar 02, 2003 20:55 solidariteit at yahoo dot com

I can see that my comrades in Ireland have the same problems with self declared 'radicals' as in Belgium. They think that they can stop the war without the support of the ordinary people of Ireland and don't understand for a second that 'radical' actions can have a negative impact on the anti-war movement. I am not against radical actions but against radical actions simply because they (actions) are radical. We must stop the war machine, not playing hide and seek with the police.

Comradely

by SP supporter Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:00

Pat Corcoran is one of these "virtual warriors tearing down virtual fences". An Armchair activist desperatly attempting to be 'radical'.

Pat Corcoran should get over his hang-ups about the Socialist Party. I dont know why you have a Spart-type hatred of the SP? is it true you were dumped by a female member of the Militant back in the early 1990s?

by pat c Mon Mar 03, 2003 15:48

"Virtual Warriors.....
by SP supporter Mon, Mar 3 2003, 11:00am

Pat Corcoran is one of these "virtual warriors tearing down virtual fences". An Armchair activist desperatly attempting to be 'radical'.

Pat Corcoran should get over his hang-ups about the Socialist Party. I dont know why you have a Spart-type hatred of the SP? is it true you were dumped by a female member of the Militant back in the early 1990s?"

this is the level of debate at which the SP operates.

Why wont they answer questionS?

are you afraid that the SP will lose support in the area if more US warplanes are diverted?

by Magneto Mon Mar 03, 2003 16:21

What D O'Heochai, fondly known as Lord Haugh Haugh is really up to;

he is telling the airport workers that they should black all planes with arms on board but let other stuff alone. So food, drink and sundries would be alright.

This he tells them will protect their jobs.

He thinks he will be able to present this as a SP victory and build up his profile.

Thats how low the SP are.

by @@ Mon Mar 03, 2003 16:52

It's true I dumped Pat C.It was because of his impotence,and small mickey and sad outlook on life in general.

by zzzzzzzzzzzzz Mon Mar 03, 2003 20:37

Hopefully Pat C will stay in his virtual world because he certainly has no idea what the real world is like and it would be terrible if he got lost in it. Just think of all the giggles we would miss out on if we didn't have any of his virtual comments to read.

zzzzzzzzzzzz...........

by john - sy Mon Mar 03, 2003 21:24

no fan of pat c but to start a pernsonal
attack on him is wrong. it gives him a leval of
credibility that he does not deserve. far better
to leave him to his secterian bickering.

by pat c Tue Mar 04, 2003 11:42

i'm glad to see that u disagree with your cdes personal attacks on me. but if my comments are just sectarian bickering, then they should be easy to deal with.

the problem for the sp remains:

THEY WONT CONDEMN THE AIRPORT POLICE.

WHY NOT?

by zzzzzzzzzzz Tue Mar 04, 2003 20:10

Pat C's virtual world is revolving around his virtual head

by PAT C Wed Mar 05, 2003 11:39

zzzz sandman joins SP zzzzz

now we all zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz