Independent Media Centre Ireland     http://www.indymedia.ie

US and Britain condemned over 'Geneva Convention breach'

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Wednesday March 26, 2003 12:51author by Adolf RuMsfield

Amnesty International has condemned the US and Britain for targeting civilian buildings in air strikes.

Although the coalition forces state they are hitting Saddam Hussein's regime command centres, the human rights body says the bombing of the Iraqi television channel could be a breach of the Geneva Conventions.

Tomahawk cruise missiles and bombs slammed into the headquarters of Iraqi state television as the allies sought to sever the link between Saddam and the population.

"The bombing of a television station, simply because it is being used for the purposes of propaganda, cannot be condoned," Amnesty International said.

"It is a civilian object, and thus protected under international humanitarian law."

But a US spokesman insisted: "These targets are key regime command and control assets."

After the pre-dawn air strikes on the Iraqi capital, monitors in London could no longer see the international 24-hour Iraqi Satellite TV. Domestic Iraqi TV, which does not broadcast at night, reportedly came back on air at about 0600 GMT. State radio was still broadcasting.

Thomas Mcinerney, a former US Air Force General, told an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations on Tuesday there are "pluses and minuses" of such a TV station continuing to operate.

Leaving the station unaffected would allow the Pentagon to broadcast its own propaganda if and when Baghdad falls. And the battle to win the hearts and minds of Iraqis depends on not destroying the civilian infrastructure

Comments (4 of 4)

Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4
author by ==publication date Wed Mar 26, 2003 13:22author address author phone

author by Sourcerpublication date Wed Mar 26, 2003 15:28author address author phone

"Amnesty International today warned that the TV station bombing could be in breach of the Geneva convention."

or straight from the horse's mouth

http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engmde140462003

Not so much a condemnation, but a comment on the legality.

Related Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,922204,00.html
author by -publication date Thu Mar 27, 2003 10:36author address author phone

I just think there's a big difference between:

"Amnesty International today warned that the TV station bombing could be in breach of the Geneva convention."

and

"Amnesty International has condemned the US and Britain for targeting civilian buildings in air strikes".

author by Me Againpublication date Thu Mar 27, 2003 18:24author address author phone

Several mainstream media outlets first reported it as a condemnation, so this is not the only place that the 'juggling' of words happened.

I agree there is a world of difference between the two statements.



Indymedia Ireland is a media collective. We are independent volunteer citizen journalists producing and distributing the authentic voices of the people. Indymedia Ireland is an open news project where anyone can post their own news, comment, videos or photos about Ireland or related matters.