Genoa riot police get 5 years 16:58 May 19 0 comments Message from Iron 16:48 Dec 01 3 comments Resist! An RNC Aftermath Documentary 19:06 Sep 21 0 comments Amy Goodman Arrested at US Republican Convention 00:48 Sep 02 9 comments Diaz Raid : “Martin Hogbin is responsible” 12:38 Apr 09 1 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireThe Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Lockdown Skeptics
Why is the Covid Inquiry Still Not Recommending Research into the Effectiveness of Lockdowns? Tue Aug 06, 2024 13:15 | Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
Peterson vs Peter Pan Tue Aug 06, 2024 11:06 | James Alexander
Good Morning Britain Branded ?Embarrassing in the Extreme? as Ed Balls Interviews His Wife Home Secr... Tue Aug 06, 2024 09:00 | Will Jones
Why Were We Edited Out of Channel 5?s Lucy Letby Documentary? Tue Aug 06, 2024 07:00 | Dr Norman Fenton
News Round-Up Tue Aug 06, 2024 01:13 | Richard Eldred
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionNetanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en |
G8 2003 Cops to Go Free?
international |
summit mobilisations |
news report
Thursday February 16, 2006 19:08 by Aubonne Support Group http://www.aubonnebridge.net
The prosecutor (lawyer of state) is demanding that the two policemen be acquitted. He is clearly trying to turn the situation upside down and make the accused (aggressors) into the victims of the police intervention... Day 3: Wednesday, 15th |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3here
http://indymedia.ie/article/74232
and here
http://www.aubonnebridge.net
and here's Martin on swiss TV
http://www.tsr.ch/tsr/index.html?siteSect=600001&sid=64...57000
from swissinfo:-
Judges on Friday said the defendants could not be blamed for causing bodily harm through negligence to a British demonstrator after policemen intervened to end the blockage of a motorway bridge near the city of Lausanne.
The court found that the officers made a mistake when they cut a rope that was stretching across the road – and to which the two protestors were attached and dangling from the bridge.
But judges ruled it was not a punishable offence and merely the result of a series of unfortunate misunderstandings. The two protesters, who were part of a group of anti G8 activists, were trying to stop delegates from reaching a summit of the world's most industrialised countries and Russia in nearby Evian in June, 2003. When police cut the rope, apparently because of a lack of communication between the two officers, one demonstrator fell 25 metres and was badly injured. The other protester, a woman from Germany, was unhurt because other activists stopped her from falling. In a first reaction, the protestors' lawyer criticised Friday's ruling as "a stab in the back of the victims".During the five-day trial, he had argued that the police interference amounted to more than negligence. He also demanded financial compensation. The prosecution had dropped all charges against the policemen. It said the risky nature of the demonstration had outweighed the outcome of the police interference. The defence lawyers had demanded an acquittal. In 2004 a court found the demonstrators guilty of obstructing traffic, while an investigation into the two police officers was dismissed through lack of evidence.
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=10...29000
Direct reaction of Martin and Gesine announced after we had left altogether the "hall of justice" in the middle of the verdict being read out:
“What we have seen here during the last three days is exactly the reason why we and thousands of other people like us all over the world think that direct action is the best way to overcome injustice.
The entire judicial procedure from the time the rope was cut has been clear whitewash. The prosecution is supposed to defend the law but what they actually defend is the state – and its officers. This court case has been an elaborate, expensive and time-consuming piece of theatre to provide a platform to find excuses for inexcusable actions and to misguide the public by pretending to provide justice.
This verdict is a pure cover up of police brutality by the justice system and is just further proof of the almost complete police impunity in Switzerland.”
http://www.aubonnebridge.net/
previous post
http://indymedia.ie/article/74232