Biden Lost Black Voters Everywhereâ€¦Exc... Wed Dec 02, 2020 15:30 | Patrick Basham
Turkey Opens Secret Channel to Fix Ties ... Wed Dec 02, 2020 14:28 | Amberin Zaman
47% of Americans Believe Itâ€™s Likely T... Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:51 | Rasmussen
BREAKING: The FBI Has Found No Evidence ... Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:40 | Exavier Saskagoochie
An All-Out Trade War With China Would Co... Wed Dec 02, 2020 08:59 | Rod Tyers
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
David Quinn’s selective tolerance
A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony
Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony
Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony
Irish Examiner bias Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Spirit of Contradiction >>
The Coronavirus Pandemic and a One World Government.
rights, freedoms and repression |
Thursday April 30, 2020 15:16 by Anthony Ravlich - https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog anthony_ravlich at yahoo dot com 10D/15 City Rd. 099409658
Suppression of freedoms in preparation for a OWG,
The connection between the coronavirus pandemic, China, the United Nations and a One World Government.
The Coronvirus Pandemic and a One World Government.
I was suspicious from the start of the coronavirus pandemic but am becoming more suspicious of China’s involvement, perhaps it’s deliberate biological warfare or perhaps gross negligence, as evidence is increasingly pointing to the Wuhan laboratories as the source of the coronavirus (see documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le_rfTdayLs).
What aroused my suspicions from the beginning and what is being overlooked in many of the discussions on the coronavirus and Wuhan is the One World Government agenda of the United Nations described in my recent book. China also seems to be a favoured State at the UN. OWG would require States to be controlled by a form of totalitarianism which I considered would require something very drastic such as a pandemic, particularly in western States, to crush freedom in preparation for totalitarian control.
Perhaps not surprisingly my book has been severely suppressed (e.g. although published in America to my knowledge it is not in any American library). It describes the creation of a new globally dominant ideology at the UN on 10 Dec 2008 which the global mainstream media failed to report. People are often dismissive of the UN seeing it as a largely powerless body but it creates ideology e.g. neoliberalism and globalization, and those people fail to see the overwhelming power of this global ideology which could be likened to the power of ideology of the communist government in China albeit at a national level
I call the new dominant ideology created at the UN neoliberal absolutism. In my view, because it would prevent people from thinking for themselves or even having a conscience of their own I regard it as evil. My book shows how neoliberal absolutism resulted in a major rebalance of global ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. It determined the decline of Western civilization and global freedom which in the ultimate would seriously threaten civilization itself. I show how neoliberal absolutism was the real cause of the Global Financial Crisis 2008 which impacted very largely on the EU.
I see neoliberal absolutism as the ideology of an OWG which promotes totalitarian and repressive regimes. China, in particular, was strongly favoured because the economic, social and cultural rights which the UN was addressing at the time were meant to protect against exploitation but failed to do so instead exploitation was permitted under international law so countries such as China with a vast workforce to exploit was highly favoured allowing China to get the competitive advantage over the West. Also, the Corporations were able to relocate to countries with cheap labour without fear exploitation would be prohibited. China which certainly appears to have much support from WHO, a UN organization, could be said to be promoting the UN’s OWG agenda to the extent it allowed coronavirus to become global and suppress freedoms.
Neoliberal absolutism is the creation of the great majority of States at the UN with only the US and to some extent the American camp dissenting. It was created by omitting many human rights in international human rights law which are meant to reflect the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. To correct the problem these human rights need to be included and in my book I recommend that the West boycott the UN until this happens.
Domestically the UN agenda (called neoliberalism and globalization based on human rights omissions) is promoted by left so-called liberals for the benefit of the establishment including right-wing politics and the Corporations. From my experience these left so-called liberals also control the mass media and because they discriminate on the grounds of social class exercise overwhelming control over society by excluding dissenting voices outside the establishment who are not captured by ideology. The prohibition of social class discrimination (which has been considered by the NZ Human Rights Commission) would greatly reduce the power of the left so-called liberals e.g. the poor would be allowed a voice of their own in the mainstream media.
A number of countries want an international investigation of the origins of the coronavirus in China. Given the considerable destruction of life and economies this certainly seems justified but China recently threatened Australia with trade sanctions for calling for such an enquiry (see above video).
More of my posts as well as links to my books can be found on my blog, outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog.