Australian Cops Pepper Spray 70 Year Old Woman in the Face 22:08 Sep 20 0 comments
Israeli spy tech firm exploited vulnerability on ALL IPHONE devices to implant ‘Pegasus’ malware 01:04 Sep 14 0 comments
FDA document admits “covid” PCR test was developed without isolated covid samples 01:37 Aug 28 0 comments
Interview with Dr. Martin Feeley who speaks on child vaccinations 23:58 Aug 19 1 commentsmore >>
News Round-Up Fri Sep 24, 2021 00:18 | Michael Curzon
The Government?s Gamesmanship and Outright Cheating on Covid and Vaccines Diminishes Us All Thu Sep 23, 2021 21:55 | Will Jones
We?re Hiring! Thu Sep 23, 2021 18:45 | Toby Young
Covid Unlikely to Mutate into a Deadly Variant, Says Lead Scientist Behind AstraZeneca Vaccine Thu Sep 23, 2021 17:39 | Michael Curzon
Record Numbers of Children Seeking Access to Mental Health Services Thu Sep 23, 2021 14:56 | Michael Curzon
Voltaire, international edition
The AUKUS preparing a nuclear war to sustain Taiwan, by Thierry Meyssan Thu Sep 23, 2021 10:18 | en
Facebook uses media to make or break politicians Wed Sep 22, 2021 13:53 | en
Joint Statement on the Phone Call between Joe Biden and Emmanuel Macron Wed Sep 22, 2021 13:50 | en
France sets up a unit to fight against foreign fake news Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:39 | en
Washington against EU Directive on digital markets Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:02 | en
By Anthony Sheridan The political administration of Ireland is corrupt. There?s an endless list of examples of such corruption stretching down through the decades but there is no need to delve into the past to make the point. We only have to note that serious criminality occurs on an ongoing basis at the very heart … Continue reading "Allegations of political criminality reported to An Garda Siochana"Politician holding a mask in front of his face speaking to a large crowd of people. (Used clipping mask)
By Anthony Sheridan
The political administration of Ireland is corrupt. There?s an endless list of examples of such corruption stretching down through the decades but there is no need to delve into the past to make the point.
We only have to note that serious criminality occurs on an ongoing basis at the very heart of our democracy. A small group of just 18 citizens [ministers] wields executive power on behalf of the people. Under the Constitution it is a criminal offence for any of these ministers to breach Cabinet confidentiality.
We know this law has been broken in the case of the proposed appointment of Catherine Zappone. We also know that no member of the Cabinet has acted to protect the integrity of the Constitution by bringing the minister[s] involved to justice.
With this in mind I have submitted the following report to An Garda Siochana [Cobh] requesting that they investigate the alleged crime.
I request that this matter be investigated as a matter of urgency.
Hard copy to:
Clerk of the Dail
Minister for Justice
By Anthony Sheridan Green Party TD Catherine Martin is unfit to represent the people of Ireland. On Thursday 2 September she cashed in her political integrity when RTEs Claire Byrne asked her how she felt about the abuse of Cabinet confidentiality. I think that?s an internal matter for Fine Gael. This is a lie because … Continue reading "Minister Catherine Martin: Not fit to serve"
By Anthony Sheridan
Green Party TD Catherine Martin is unfit to represent the people of Ireland. On Thursday 2 September she cashed in her political integrity when RTEs Claire Byrne asked her how she felt about the abuse of Cabinet confidentiality.
This is a lie because Ms. Martin knows that breaching Cabinet confidentiality is a criminal act and that she, as a cabinet minister, is not only obliged to acknowledge the crime but to act on that knowledge.
By failing to act Ms. Martin has tainted the seal of office bestowed on her by the people of Ireland and thrown in her lot with the cabal of political shysters who have inflicted so much damage on Ireland over the decades.
Whenever an individual or party decides to enter government in Ireland they must make a choice. Challenge and expose the rot eating away at the core of the state or abandon all principles and collaborate with those who have no regard for democracy or the interests of the country.
Clearly, Ms Martin has chosen the latter. It?s likely that her motives are based on the genuine but naïve belief that the end justifies the means. That the implementation of her party?s political agenda is worth the abandonment of her political principles ? if so, she is seriously wrong in that belief.
Ireland is not a normal democratic state. The disease of political corruption has polluted the administration of the state to such an extent that all who associate themselves with the diseased become diseased themselves.
This disease must first be eradicated before our country has any hope of becoming a healthy democracy. For that to happen good people must deploy the weapons of courage and principle against the political shysters.
Ms. Martin?s failure to do so will see the people remove her and her party from power at the first opportunity.
Copy to Catherine Martin
Relevant section of interview with Minister Martin.
By Anthony Sheridan There?s a constant stream of articles by mainstream journalists struggling to explain why the political establishment they so loyally serve, continues to lose popular support. The articles all take similar form. A brief history of the failing fortunes of their favoured party, be it Fine Gael, Fianna Fail or Labour. Sometimes we?re … Continue reading "Establishment media and delusional analysis"
By Anthony Sheridan
There?s a constant stream of articles by mainstream journalists struggling to explain why the political establishment they so loyally serve, continues to lose popular support.
The articles all take similar form.
A brief history of the failing fortunes of their favoured party, be it Fine Gael, Fianna Fail or Labour. Sometimes we?re presented with bizarre reasons for the collapse in support for these parties but more often than not, no explanation whatsoever is given.
In place of truth and reality these journalists invariably resort to delusional analysis.
Harry McGee, the political correspondent with the Irish Times, provided one such example recently.
Writing about Fianna Fail?s continuing decline, he makes the following points without providing any explanation or analysis.
So here, briefly, is the reason for the above developments which McGee fears to address.
It was not the changing nature of Irish society that led Fine Gael and Fianna Fail to form a coalition. It was an act of desperation by both parties to hold onto the power and privilege they have enjoyed for decades.
The continuing fall in support for the parties of the centre between 1982 and 2020 is a direct consequence of the incompetence, arrogance and corruption of the ruling political class.
McDonald is likely to be the next Taoiseach because the people are desperate to get rid of the current corrupt political class. The people want radical change, that?s what they have been voting for over the past several elections.
Establishment journalists do not see this because they operate within the same bubble occupied by the ruling political class.
So, instead of exposing the rot at the centre of Irish politics, journalists such as McGee resort to attacking those who are challenging the old, dying regime. Sinn Fein, because it poses the greatest threat to the power of that regime, is usually the prime target.
McGee?s analysis is both amateurish and delusional. He claims that a section of the electorate is strongly opposed to a Sinn Fein led government because of
There is no doubt that there are many opposed to a Sinn Fein led government because of what happened during the troubles but for a journalist to make such a political point without a balancing context, is to indulge in cheap propaganda.
For example, an unbiased journalist would balance the activities of the republican movement with the ruthless apartheid system operated by Unionists over a period of 50 years.
Next, he praises the openness of Fine Gael and Fianna Fail?s weekly parliamentary meetings and condemns the so-called secrecy of Sinn Fein meetings, suggesting that the party is acting undemocratically.
Of course, McGee knows very well that all political parties strive to keep their weekly meetings private. The only reason we know what goes on at FG/FF meetings is because they leak like a sieve. He also knows that the leaks are a reflection of the rancour and disunity within these two parties while Sinn Fein?s success in keeping their deliberations confidential is an indication of the party?s unity of purpose.
The purpose of this fake analysis is, of course, to throw mud in the hope that some will stick. It?s an effective propaganda tool but one that is spurned by professional journalists.
McGee ends his article on a note of high arrogance when he wonders how Sinn Fein will deal with sensitive security departments if they enter government.
Actually, there is another way of putting it.
Sinn Fein is a 100% legitimate political party with massive and growing support. That support stems from the democratic power of the people who are more than willing to trust Sinn Fein representatives serving in any department.
It is the height of paternalistic arrogance for a journalist to take upon himself the notion that the people?s democratic choice should be conditional or limited in any manner, in forming a government.
In his unquestioning loyalty to the rotten centre of Irish politics McGee is blind to the fact that the people are increasingly seeing his beloved political class as the enemy and Sinn Fein as the only hope for an accountable democracy.
This type of journalism is not without consequences. Good quality political analysis is critical in a democracy. When journalists speak truth to power, political behaviour improves and democracy remains healthy.
When politicians are confident that journalists will not only defend their errant behaviour but actively attack those who challenge the rotten status quo, the political system and democracy is exposed to serious damage.
That is exactly what is happening in Ireland today.
By Anthony Sheridan Irish Examiner journalist Aoife Moore is not happy. The young people of Ireland are suffering because they don?t have a seat at the table [of power] she thundered in a recent article. Focusing mainly on the youth wings of political parties Moore tells us the young are bullied, harassed, their complaints go … Continue reading "Youth power – Don’t ask – Take"
By Anthony Sheridan
Irish Examiner journalist Aoife Moore is not happy. The young people of Ireland are suffering because they don?t have a seat at the table [of power] she thundered in a recent article.
Focusing mainly on the youth wings of political parties Moore tells us the young are bullied, harassed, their complaints go unanswered, they?re not viewed as important, all of which is driving them away from politics.
Nothing will change, she asserts, until the grown-ups give the young a seat at the table of power.
This bizarre idea that young adults are children waiting for the ?grown-ups? to hand them power portrays a serious lack of understanding about the role young people play in politics.
Instead of whinging about being ignored by those at the table of power the young should be upending that table and forcibly taking their rightful place in the governance of the country.
Young people should be organised and focused in challenging the ?grown-ups?, they should give no quarter in their determination to gain power and implement their policies.
The regular injection of political radicalism by the young is one of the mainstays of a healthy democracy.
Sadly, such political radicalism has never taken root in Ireland and forced emigration is the principal reason. The primitive economic strategy of boom and bust has always suited the ruling establishment. In boom times friends are looked after, when bust inevitably follows ordinary citizens are made to pay and forced emigration is just one of the costs.
Banishing young people to the four corners of the world removes political radicalism from the body politic thus eliminating any threat to the stale but very comfortable political establishment.
This is why successive Irish governments, unlike most other governments in the world, have staunchly refused to grant a vote to emigrants. Out of sight, out of mind and forever out of power has always been the self-interested strategy of the ruling political class when it comes to young people.
Those who remain behind are usually politically apathetic or become members of youth wings of the establishment parties. Within these ultra-conservative entities the young morph into clones of their ?grown-ups?. They are quickly indoctrinated into the ways of political gombeenism which includes stamping out any sign of political radicalism ? and so, the rotten establishment wheel continues to spin.
But change is coming as we?ve seen from recent elections but it?s not coming from the lost youth in the establishment parties that Ms Moore is so concerned about. It?s coming from outside the ruling political class, from an increasingly radicalised electorate determined to create a decent country not just for the young but for all citizens.
By Anthony Sheridan The political establishment that has [mis]ruled Ireland since independence is on the verge of extinction. For clarity, here?s a good definition of the term ?establishment?. The ruling class or authority group in a society; especially, an entrenched authority dedicated to preserving the status quo. An establishment?s greatest resource is the people over … Continue reading "When the establishment betrays the people?s trust"
By Anthony Sheridan
The political establishment that has [mis]ruled Ireland since independence is on the verge of extinction.
For clarity, here?s a good definition of the term ?establishment?.
An establishment?s greatest resource is the people over whom it exercises power. Its success depends on the people?s willingness to tolerate its behaviour.
When an establishment betrays the people?s trust one of two things will happen. The ruling elite will attempt to preserve its power by becoming ever more oppressive, even to the point of violence, or the people will bring it down and replace it with a new establishment that will return the balance between rulers and the ruled.
For example, abuse of power and an abject failure to respond to the needs of ordinary people trigged the French revolution in 1789. The revolution marked the beginning of the end of the divine right of kings to rule and the eventual emergence of the middle class political establishment we see in France today.
In addition to getting rid of corrupt regimes revolutions also serve to enlighten citizens to the fact that it is they, and not the ruling elite, who are the rightful owners of political power. They become aware that power flows from the bottom up, that those at the top exercise power solely on sufferance from the people. This sense of people power is as strong in France today as it was in 1789.
Unfortunately, the opposite is the case in Ireland. This is because there has never been a political revolution in our country and as a consequence there has never been a change in the mindset that sees power as belonging to the powerful.
We had a rebellion in 1916 that ultimately persuaded the British establishment, who were distracted by the brutality of WWI, that a degree of independence for Ireland within the Commonwealth was better than more war and rising criticism from the international community.
This resulted in the relatively smooth replacement of an oppressive, self-serving colonial establishment with an equally oppressive, self-serving home-grown version.
This home-grown establishment immediately set about creating a political regime that ensured the subservient mindset instilled in the population over centuries of colonialism lived on as a powerful means of political manipulation.
They created a system of gombeen clientelism where crumbs were handed out in payment for votes. Citizens were led to believe that the natural order of power in a democracy was a top down system, where the ruling establishment knew best.
This is why, unlike functional democracies, Ireland never benefitted from the healthy tension between a Left/Right political system. There was never any real political opposition in our parliament. We never witnessed political parties seriously competing with each other to promote and implement their own political ideologies for the greater good of the country.
All we got was a political ruling elite, principally made up of Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, masquerading as separate political parties. They are, and always have been, one political class with one overriding ambition ? to exploit the people and resources of Ireland for their own benefit. The only competition they engaged in over the decades was in the Tweedledee Tweedledum race for government where the opportunities for self-enrichment are most plentiful.
As the political establishment became weaker in recent years smaller parties such as the Progressive Democrats, Labour and, currently the Greens were recruited to support the ruling political class.
The abandonment of most, if not all, of the ideals and policies of these smaller parties was the price demanded and received in exchange for admission to the exclusive ruling elite club.
The British left-wing journalist, Owen Jones, provides the best definition of this particular type of establishment:
But the century long manipulation of the people and contempt for democracy by this political regime is rapidly coming to an end. Irish citizens are beginning to realise that it is they who are the rightful owners of power and not the ruling political establishment.
It is crystal clear from recent elections and polls that the people are rejecting the old regime and are demanding real change in how the country is governed. That this demand for change is being ignored not just by the political centre but also by mainstream media demonstrates just how out of touch the establishment is with this revolutionary redirection in Irish political history.
The consensus among the ruling regime is that housing, health and the economy are the reasons for their continuing loss of power, that if these problems are fixed they will survive ? it is a vain hope.
While these problems are obviously of huge concern to the electorate they take second place to the demand for radical political change. People have come to realise that the old regime must be abolished and replaced with a genuinely democratic system. This change of mindset in the electorate is not a temporary phenomenon, it?s permanent ? the old corrupt regime is finished.
The dramatic and historic rise in support for Sinn Fein is the most visible sign of this new emerging political landscape. But that party should take note. If it fails to radically overhaul how the state is governed, if it fails to abolish the old establishment and create a genuinely democratic balance between rulers and the ruled then it too will be rejected by the power of the newly enlightened electorate.
By Anthony Sheridan Any rational person listening to Sarah McInerney?s interview of Eoghan Harris could be forgiven for thinking that he suffers from an illness known as Delusional Disorder. People suffering from this mental illness are incapable of telling what?s real from what?s imagined. In this context it is pointless responding directly to his ramblings … Continue reading "The day Eoghan Harris went bad"
By Anthony Sheridan
Any rational person listening to Sarah McInerney?s interview of Eoghan Harris could be forgiven for thinking that he suffers from an illness known as Delusional Disorder. People suffering from this mental illness are incapable of telling what?s real from what?s imagined.
In this context it is pointless responding directly to his ramblings with any seriousness. However, the failure of the establishment media to unequivocally condemn the behaviour of Harris and his collaborators is another story altogether.
Take communications guru Terry Prone for example. Writing in the Irish Examiner she was in no doubt where the blame lay.
This bizarre attempt to exonerate a favoured son of the establishment by blaming everybody, except him, suggests that Prone may also be experiencing a touch of Delusional Disorder.
But for the record and for Ms. Prone?s information somebody did notice the moment when Harris went off the rails as a journalist. Here?s an article I wrote six years ago in response to Harris? refusal to criticise Denis O?Brien, the then owner of Independent Newspapers, during the Siteserv scandal.
Eoghan Harris: A ?journalist? with little integrity
16 June 2015
In response to the ongoing Siteserv scandal Sunday Independent columnist Eoghan Harris has effectively admitted that he?s a coward and a man/journalist of little integrity.
On prudent reflection, I decided to take the advice of the Kerry sage, Tommy the ?Kaiser? Fitzgerald: Don?t say anything, and don?t write anything, because when you put the black on the white, you are fucked boy.
What a sad end for a man who, wielding a razor sharp brain, used to tear strips from the hypocritical, arrogant and corrupt gangsters who misrule our country.
Now he?s a fully signed up toady of the rotten culture he once so brilliantly challenged. Whatever dulled his rapier like pen over the years has also dulled his mind to a state of stupidity where he effectively admits that he?s an intellectual slave to Denis O?Brien.
At least his many colleagues at ?Independent? Newspapers, also toadies to the master, make some effort, no matter how pathetic, at journalistic integrity.
The rest of Harris? article accurately reflects the only ?talent? he still possesses ? chief cheerleader for the establishment?s anti-Sinn Fein propaganda campaign. He begins this section of his article with the words:
Let me turn to a safer topic.
Propaganda is, of course, always a safe topic for a journalist because there?s no need for truth or honesty but how sad to witness any journalist actually write, in black and white, the words
?Let me turn to a safer topic?.
By Anthony Sheridan In 2018 Stephen Donnelly Fianna Fail TD was refused permission to erect a fence around his home. In 2021 a fence was erected around his home at taxpayer?s expense. Just two things changed between 2018 and 2021- Donnelly became the Minister for Health and sometime between the end of January and … Continue reading "Declining standards in Irish journalism"
By Anthony Sheridan
In 2018 Stephen Donnelly Fianna Fail TD was refused permission to erect a fence around his home. In 2021 a fence was erected around his home at taxpayer?s expense.
Just two things changed between 2018 and 2021- Donnelly became the Minister for Health and sometime between the end of January and early Feb this year, a number of incidents were alleged to have occurred at the Minister?s home.
But this article is not about the Minister or the alleged incidents. It?s about declining standards in Irish mainstream journalism. These declining standards are clearly evident in how this particular story was reported.
The story broke on 20 Feb last when Irish Examiner journalists Paul Hosford and Aoife Moore reported they had received an anonymous tipoff that a security fence had been erected outside the Minister?s home as a result of the incidents.
An unidentified source said the fence was erected after items were thrown at windows and left on the minister?s doorstep.
An unidentified spokesperson for the Minister declined to comment except to say the fence was for security reasons.
The story was accompanied by an outraged [anonymous] editorial condemning the alleged attack on the minister?s home.
So, what have we so far?
An anonymous tipoff followed by an unidentified source, followed by an unidentified spokesperson alleging, without providing any evidence, that at some point in the recent past, persons unknown threw items at the windows of the Minister?s home and left items on his doorstep.
In other words, what we have so far is ? hearsay
Later that day Ms Moore was interviewed by Damien O?Reilly on RTEs Brendan O?Connor Show where RTE had upped the language surrounding the story from ?incidents? to ?an attack? on the minister?s home.
Unfortunately, Ms Moore did not provide any additional information but did expand on what she did not know ? some examples.
So here we have a journalist reporting an [alleged] attack on a government minister and happily accepting that such a serious event can be treated as a private family matter.
Ms. Moore was however very supportive and even emotional on behalf of the minister.
Staying with the emotional angle O?Reilly/RTE linked this alleged attack with the perfectly legitimate, peaceful protests held outside the then Minister for Health Simon Harris? home in 2019.
Ms. Moore was also happy to go along with this unprofessional linking of two completely different stories.
O?Reilly concluded the interview with a strong note of outrage:
That appeared to be the end of the story but then, curiously, a full seven weeks later, on April 9, the story was resurrected when Newstalk journalist Ciara Kelly interviewed Minister Donnelly in his constituency in Greystones Co Wicklow.
Listening to the interview it was clear Ms. Kelly is a great admirer of the minister, excitedly telling listeners that both of them were locals and even attended the same school.
The form of the interview was very similar to that on RTE between journalist Aoife Moore and journalist Damien O?Reilly. Very friendly, no challenging questions and buckets of sympathy for the minister for the alleged attack on his home.
If Ms. Kelly did understand why a government minister would want to keep the details of an alleged attack on his home secret, she wasn?t telling her listeners. Just as journalist Aoife Moore was happy to accept that such an attack could be treated as a private family matter.
Ms. Kelly?s co-presenter Shane Coleman concluded the piece in a similar manner as Damien O?Reilly did on RTE by angrily asking:
So here we have five journalists reporting a story as fact without any real evidence. Apparently cooperating with anonymous sources and the minister to keep details of the story secret and expressing strong support and sympathy for the minister?s unsubstantiated claims.
This is not journalism, it’s hearsay bordering on false reporting. Journalists cannot retain credibility when they publish stories without corroborating evidence.
Respect for their profession is also seriously damaged when they take sides, particularly when they take the side of a government minister who stands to gain from such media support.
Aoife Moore: Irish Examiner journalist
Paul Hosford: Irish Examiner journalist
Damien O?Reilly: RTE journalist
Ciara Kelly: Newstalk journalist
Shane Coleman: Newstalk journalist
Stephen Donnelly: Minister for Health
By Anthony Sheridan A deep and disturbing malaise has taken hold of journalism right across mainstream media. The infection stems from the decades long close and inappropriate association of journalists with the rotten centre of Irish politics principally composed of Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and Labour. For a long time the sickness was hardly noticeable … Continue reading "Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power"
By Anthony Sheridan
A deep and disturbing malaise has taken hold of journalism right across mainstream media. The infection stems from the decades long close and inappropriate association of journalists with the rotten centre of Irish politics principally composed of Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and Labour.
For a long time the sickness was hardly noticeable but the brutal austerity implemented by the political centre in response to the 2008 economic collapse opened the eyes of many Irish citizens. And not just to how power was wielded in the interests of the powerful, but how mainstream media provided unquestioning support for the actions of the political establishment.
The unhealthy relationship between mainstream media and the ruling political class has become so close that the journalists themselves seem to be genuinely unaware of it.
A recent political podcast by the Irish Times, in which readers were invited to submit questions to journalists, provides a startling example of how mainstream journalism has become a parody of what good journalism should be all about.
I submitted the following question to the podcast which was selected for discussion:
Harry McGee, the Irish Times political correspondent, responded but failed to adequately address the question. Instead, he unwittingly revealed the true nature of the tainted relationship between mainstream journalism and the political establishment.
Effectively, McGee is making the shocking admission that Irish mainstream journalists do not observe one of the central principles of international journalism – the obligation to speak truth to power.
He is candidly admitting that mainstream journalists do not come down hard on establishment politicians because they depend on them for stories.
It is, of course, true that journalists line up like ducks in a pond to be fed tit bits by politicians in return for favourable reportage but it is rare to witness a journalist actually admit to this reality.
McGee went on to deny that there was any concerted attack on Sinn Fein feebly claiming that the problem lay with Sinn Fein?s reluctance to make itself accessible to media.
The notion that Sinn Fein is shy about engaging with media is almost as ridiculous as claiming that there?s no concerted campaign against the rise of that party.
So here?s the truth that McGee and his colleagues in mainstream media are so fearful of confronting.
The political centre is on a death spiral after decades of corruption, incompetence and arrogance wrapped in a blanket of delusion that they have a divine right to rule.
This is not opinion, it?s fact. Labour are in the waiting room to extinction, Fine Gael effectively lost the last three elections and Fianna Fail are struggling to remain relevant as the the party begins to tear itself asunder in an internal civil war.
All of this has come about for one simple but powerful reason ? the Irish electorate, in election after election, has rejected the old corrupt regime and is demanding radical change.
But this ongoing revolutionary shift across the entire political landscape is practically ignored by mainstream media. Instead, in an increasingly desperate effort to defend and preserve the old regime, we see an avalanche of ?end of civilisation? type articles and broadcasts warning of the dangers of populism, Trumpism, the so-called evils of social media and increasingly bizarre anti-Sinn Fein propaganda.
The sickness that has resulted in mainstream media abandoning its obligation to speak truth to power is best summed up by McGee?s mindset:
This dangerous mindset is in stark contrast to the highest principles of the profession as expressed by the French philosopher Michel Foucault:
By Anthony Sheridan Recently, militant Catholic David Quinn blocked me on Twitter. Mr. Quinn was defending the reputation of the Catholic Church[CC]. Here?s my ‘offending’ tweet: Wrong. The CC is global and Ireland was a particularly good breeding ground for brutal priests and nuns who obeyed orders without question. I?m an atheist so it might … Continue reading "David Quinn’s selective tolerance"
By Anthony Sheridan
Recently, militant Catholic David Quinn blocked me on Twitter. Mr. Quinn was defending the reputation of the Catholic Church[CC].
Here?s my ‘offending’ tweet:
I?m an atheist so it might be thought a block was to be expected but in fact myself and Quinn have engaged in various twitter discussions over a number of years without a block in sight.
His decision to block me is all the more puzzling because just nine days later he wrote an article in the Sunday Times extolling his virtues of tolerance.
He was writing about a matter of which both of us are in full agreement, the hilariously stupid decision of the Trinity College Historical Society to cancel an invitation to atheist Richard Dawkins to speak at the college.
Quinn strongly believes, as I do, that Dawkins should not have been banned, that free speech, no matter how controversial, is paramount.
To demonstrate his unlimited respect for free speech Quinn quoted some views held by Dawkins.
That raising a child as a Catholic can be compared to sexual abuse.
That the Catholic Church is a disgusting institution.
That the god of the Old Testament is a genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.
Obviously, Quinn does not agree with these views but, because of his [apparent] respect for freedom of speech he?s prepared to defend Dawkins? right to express them.
The decision by the Trinity Historical Society to cancel Dawkins? speech was, according to Quinn:
So why, I ask, did Quinn ?cancel culture? me from his twitter link for making a relatively benign [and truthful] comment?
Hypocrisy, I suspect, is the answer. In public Quinn pretends to be a hero of tolerance while in private he deletes those who challenge his beliefs, just as his Catholic Church has been doing for centuries.
By Anthony Sheridan Ok, let?s get the obvious truth out in the open – Seamus Woulfe is a dud judge. He?s not fit to judge a dog show never mind sit in judgement in the highest court in the land. [With sincere apologies to all dog show judges.] We only have to look at some … Continue reading "A Woulfe in judges clothing"
By Anthony Sheridan
Ok, let?s get the obvious truth out in the open – Seamus Woulfe is a dud judge. He?s not fit to judge a dog show never mind sit in judgement in the highest court in the land. [With sincere apologies to all dog show judges.]
We only have to look at some of his judgements surrounding Golfgate to see how unfit he is to hold such a high position. As a Supreme Court judge he felt it was acceptable to:
Party with politicians.
Break Covid 19 rules he had helped draw up.
Blame everybody else for the consequences of his bad judgements.
Furthermore, it is clear that his overweening arrogance has completely blinded him to the core reality surrounding his behaviour ? the obvious requirement for his immediate resignation.
In addition to all this he has completely misread the clear signals encouraging him to take the honourable course of falling on his sword.
The first signal came from retired Supreme Court judge Susan Denham?s report when she found it would be unjust and disproportionate to call for his resignation. The key words here are ?to call for?. Anyone not overwhelmed by their own self importance would have clearly understood the subtle message ? wield the sword yourself.
Clearly, Judge Woulfe does not do subtlety so a second signal was necessary.
This occurred when the Judicial Council released the entire transcript of Woulfe?s first interview with Ms. justice Denham. This unprecedented public washing of judicial dirty laundry had the entire country cringing in embarrassment at the bizarre and abject excuses proffered by justice Woulfe.
Everybody, that is, except Woulfe himself. He seems to be genuinely puzzled by the angry response of politicians, colleagues in the judiciary and the general public.
It was time to call in the heavy gang, so to speak. Three senior judges met with Mr. Justice Woulfe to discuss how the matter could be resolved. It has been reported that the meeting did not go well, that Woulfe was shocked by the proposals they were offering to resolve the matter.
Did not go well, is, without doubt, the understatement of the year.
It is highly likely that the judges [metaphorically of course] took Woulfe by the throat, pinned him up against a wall and shouted in his face:
But still, the thickness of his skull prevented the message from getting through. Instead of recognising the brutal fact that his Supreme Court career is over, Woulfe decided to call in sick.
There is now no way back for justice Woulfe nor, indeed, the judiciary. All the dirty laundry is out there. If he is not removed or forced to resign the reputational damage to the judiciary will be enormous and permanent.
And Mr. Justice Woulfe will not primarily be responsible for that damage. His complete lack of understanding of the responsibilities and propriety expected of a Supreme Court judge has earned him a gold plated fools pass.
No, responsibility lies with the judiciary and the mainstream political parties who, over the decades, formed a relationship so close it left no room for the accountbility that is the norm in other jurisdictions.
It was inevitable, sooner or later, that a Woulfe in judges clothing would gain entry and wreak the havoc we are now witnessing.