|
Blog Feeds
Anti-Empire
Human Rights in IrelandIndymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Lockdown Skeptics
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international edition
|
The Lesson of Al-Hudaybiyah national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Friday June 07, 2002 02:54 by Joseph Farah - WorldNetDaily.com
![]() President Bush was quick to praise Yasser Arafat's pledges of reforms and elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council. My guess is that the administration didn't actually read a translation of Arafat's long-winded speech. Yes, Arafat took "full responsibility" for any mistakes he has made. Yes, he called for political reforms by his Palestinian Authority. Yes, he pledged to hold new elections. Yes, he even held out the possibility of establishing peace with Israel. But here's the rest of the story. Let me explain why all that is meaningless in the context of Arafat's address. The "peace" Arafat discussed with his people was only discussed as a "strategic option." Let me explain what he means about "peace" with Israel and what he has always meant when he uses this term. Arafat cited as his model for that "peace" – as he has so often throughout his bloody career – the treaty signed by Muhammad with the Quraish tribe in Mecca in the 7th century at Hudaybiyah. There is a principle in Islam known as Takiya, the right to fake peace when you are weak for the purposes of defeating your enemy when you are stronger. This is the only principle at work in Arafat's notions of "peace." It has always been the only principle at work in his notions of "peace." On April 18, 1998, during an interview on Egyptian television, Arafat was asked about his participation in the Oslo Accords – the very basis of all negotiations between Israelis and Arafat since 1993. He cited Hudaybiyah. Arafat laid it out clearly May 15 for anyone who wanted to bother translating his Arabic: "The Palestinian public opinion and the Arab public opinion have reached the conclusion that these operations (terrorism) do not serve our goals, and only incites numerous large sectors of the international community against the United States. ... These operations are causing a controversy. I call on your respected council to talk over this issue, which is now controversial in our Palestinian and Arab arenas." "What we want is true freedom and full independence in the independent state of Palestine, with holy Jerusalem as its capital, whether they like it or not," he laughed. "Those who do not like it, they can go and drink from the Dead Sea." After 40 years of Arafat, you would think the world would catch on to his antics. I'm sorry to say the United States is among those still being hoodwinked by his strategic deception. |
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)