Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Net Zero vs AI: Starmer Hasn?t Worked Out That The U.K. Can?t Be a ?Superpower? in Both Climate and ... Thu Jan 16, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile Keir Starmer wants Britain to be both an "AI superpower" and a "clean energy superpower". He can't have it both ways, says Ben Pile. AI is hugely energy intensive and inconsistent with the path Net Zero is leading us down.
The post Net Zero vs AI: Starmer Hasn’t Worked Out That The U.K. Can’t Be a ‘Superpower’ in Both Climate and Computing appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Jan 16, 2025 00:50 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Labour U-Turns Over University Free Speech as it Brings Back Tory Law ? But Removes its ?Teeth? Wed Jan 15, 2025 19:30 | Will Jones Labour has U-turned over university free speech as it brings back a Tory law clamping down on 'woke' cancel culture ? but removes its "teeth" by dropping the ability of academics to sue their institutions.
The post Labour U-Turns Over University Free Speech as it Brings Back Tory Law ? But Removes its “Teeth” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Israel and Hamas Agree Ceasefire Deal, Trump Confirms Wed Jan 15, 2025 18:09 | Will Jones Donald Trump has confirmed that Israel and Hamas have reached a ceasefire agreement to end the war and release the hostages, saying he will continue promoting "peace through strength" throughout the region.
The post Israel and Hamas Agree Ceasefire Deal, Trump Confirms appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Reeves Jobs Bloodbath Continues as Currys Forced to Outsource to India Wed Jan 15, 2025 15:21 | Will Jones The jobs bloodbath continues as Currys is forced to?outsource more British staff to India?as a result of Rachel Reeves's "tax on jobs", the Chief Executive of the electricals retailer has said.
The post Reeves Jobs Bloodbath Continues as Currys Forced to Outsource to India appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Trump and Musk, Canada, Panama and Greenland, an old story, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jan 14, 2025 07:03 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Garda convicted of assaulting teacher at rally
national |
crime and justice |
other press
Tuesday December 07, 2004 11:27 by Liam
(The Fall guy?)
Garda Paul Daly was found guilty by an 11-1 majority by a jury at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court of assaulting Mr Emmet Bunting (28), of Collins Avenue, Dublin, on May 6th, 2002, but acquitted him and his colleague, Garda Fergus Hogan, on charges of assault causing harm to Mr Bunting.
Both officers are attached to Pearse Street Garda station and had pleaded not guilty.
The jury of seven men and five women returned its verdicts after deliberating for almost three hours. It was the sixth day of the trial.
Judge Yvonne Murphy remanded Garda Daly on continuing bail for sentence on January 13th, 2005, and discharged Garda Hogan from the court. A garda has been convicted of assaulting a school teacher in the 2002 May Day "Reclaim the Streets" demonstration in Dublin city centre.
Garda Paul Daly was found guilty by an 11-1 majority by a jury at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court of assaulting Mr Emmet Bunting (28), of Collins Avenue, Dublin, on May 6th, 2002, but acquitted him and his colleague, Garda Fergus Hogan, on charges of assault causing harm to Mr Bunting.
Both officers are attached to Pearse Street Garda station and had pleaded not guilty.
The jury of seven men and five women returned its verdicts after deliberating for almost three hours. It was the sixth day of the trial.
Judge Yvonne Murphy remanded Garda Daly on continuing bail for sentence on January 13th, 2005, and discharged Garda Hogan from the court.
Judge Murphy told the jury that if it did not feel it was proven that harm was caused to Mr Bunting in the incident, but did believe they intentionally assaulted him, it could then convict on the lesser charge of assault.
Judge Murphy warned the jury to be careful when considering the identification of each of the accused.
She said it must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that identifications made by Insp Brendan Connolly and Insp Dan Quill during the trial were correct, and must also carefully consider the identification evidence of the two expert witnesses.
Judge Murphy said the issue of self-defence simply did not arise in this case, and further advised that it was irrelevant that Mr Bunting has started civil proceedings regarding his injuries.
Mr Tom O'Connell SC, prosecuting, said it was the State's case that Mr Bunting was punched in the face by Garda Hogan, causing him to fall to the ground, and that subsequently Garda Daly beat him on the head with his baton.
Mr Bernard Condon (with Mr O'Connell), in closing the prosecution case, advised the jury that any opinions they had on policing or protesting were not relevant to the case and must not be brought into play when considering its verdict.
Mr Condon said they must remember that Mr Bunting was never accused of misbehaving during the protest.
It was never suggested to Mr Bunting, in cross-examination, that he had "blackguarded his way around this city".
Mr Condon suggested that the defence's expert witness, Mr Ashley Windsor, was "fantasising" if he wanted the jury to believe that the video showed what Mr Windsor called "an alleged punch" at Mr Bunting by a garda. "It can be seen by anyone down here on earth that it was a punch."
He further asked the jury to dismiss Mr Windsor's evidence that Mr Bunting took a "Mohammed Ail-type sway" to avoid the oncoming punch, and the suggestion that no contact was made with Mr Bunting's face.
Mr Gerard Clarke SC (with Mr Breffni Gordon) defending, told the jury to consider that as Mr Bunting had started civil proceedings in relation to his injuries, he had something to gain if the gardaí were found guilty of the charges.
He said there were two issues to be considered: what happened to Mr Bunting and who, if anyone, did this to him. Mr Clarke said both the prosecution expert witness, Mr Andrew Laws, and the defence expert witness, Mr Windsor, stated in evidence that the actual point of contact between the suspect garda's fist and Mr Bunting's face could not be seen on the video footage.
He asked the jury to consider the possibility that Mr Bunting sustained the injuries to his face when he fell on the ground.
Mr Clarke reminded the jury of Mr Windsor's evidence, that "a garda in a short-sleeved blue shirt", who was not one of the accused in this trial, raised his baton and hit Mr Bunting as he fell backwards after avoiding the punch from another garda.
© The Irish Times
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (9 of 9)
Jump To Comment: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1"What more can be done?"
Oh I dunno, this event happened a week before the general election every party used it as a cry to demand an independent ombudsman for the Gardaí, over 2 1/2 years later it hasn't materialised.......
Re your comment about whether any senior gardai are on trial - are you suggesting we should now prosecute people when a complaint has not even been made against them.
If you have evidence against these 'senior gardai', perhaps you can visit your local garda station.
If there is no evidence and if they didn't commit any crime - what would you put them on trial for?
I'm sick and tired of this cry-baby attitude to May Day. Six gardai have been put on trial for those events - one of them has been found guilty. In all other cases, the jury acquitted the officers. What more can be done?
And does this sentence mean that only one of the Gardai found to be guilty of assault is being penalised for that?
Were there any saucy comments from the bench such as the ones that non-Garda defendants are regularly subjected to? Any judicial snickering and pontificating?
How about a couple of headlines about "Blue Bloc Thugs Caught on Camera - How the Gardai Lied about Their Riot"?
"Oh no ... hang on ... Mary Kelly walked free ... a garda has been found guilty ... the jury wasn't rigged ... there is no grand conspiracy."
har har, one guard does not a system make...
thats not likely. no teacher bashing needed, whether by cops batons or metaphorically .
i think the fact that he was a teacher helped his case. if he was a student it probably would have been different
Criticizing the jury when they convict or when they don't.
Well done, the jury, anyway. Justice must be done.
I fear that there has been more jury-rigging.
It's an absolute disgrace what these gardai get away with it. I believe there is a grand conspiracy to put good people like Mary Kelly behind bars and keep these beasts in their jobs.
Oh no ... hang on ... Mary Kelly walked free ... a garda has been found guilty ... the jury wasn't rigged ... there is no grand conspiracy.
Well done - that jury!!