The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
Judges Told to Avoid Saying ?Asylum Seekers? and ?Immigrants? Fri Jul 26, 2024 17:00 | Toby Young A new edition of the Equal Treatment Bench Book instructs judges to avoid terms such as 'asylum seekers', 'immigrant' and 'gays', which it says can be 'dehumanising'.
The post Judges Told to Avoid Saying ?Asylum Seekers? and ?Immigrants? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum Fri Jul 26, 2024 15:00 | Toby Young Labour has appointed Becky Francis, an intersectional feminist, to rewrite the national curriculum, which it will then force all schools to teach. Prepare for even more woke claptrap to be shoehorned into the classroom.
The post The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech Fri Jul 26, 2024 13:03 | Toby Young The Government has just announced it intends to block the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, effectively declaring war on free speech. It's time to join the Free Speech Union and fight back.
The post Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
I Wrote an Article for Forbes Defending J.D. Vance From Accusations of ?Climate Denialism?. Forty Ei... Fri Jul 26, 2024 11:00 | Tilak Doshi On July 18th, Dr Tilak Doshi wrote an article for Forbes defending J.D. Vance from accusations of 'climate denialism'. 48 hours later, Forbes un-published the article. Read the article on the Daily Sceptic.
The post I Wrote an Article for Forbes Defending J.D. Vance From Accusations of ?Climate Denialism?. Forty Eight Hours Later, Forbes Un-Published the Article and Sacked Me as a Contributor appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Come and See Nick Dixon and me Recording the Weekly Sceptic at the Hippodrome on Monday Fri Jul 26, 2024 09:00 | Toby Young Tickets are still available to a live recording of the Weekly Sceptic, Britain's only podcast to break into the top five of Apple's podcast chart. It?s at Lola's, the downstairs bar of the Hippodrome on Monday July 29th.
The post Come and See Nick Dixon and me Recording the Weekly Sceptic at the Hippodrome on Monday appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Presidential Elections Unconstitutional
national |
politics / elections |
opinion/analysis
Wednesday March 30, 2005 18:31 by John Fitzgibbon - Various johnfitz at connect dot ie Dublin 01 2853387
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
Keep it Quiet! They don't want to know
Attempts to raise the constitutionality of Presidential elections in 1997 and recently via the papers and radio shows were completely ignored. The 1997 letter herewith outlines the thinking. A further aspect raised its head in the recent election, i.e. the denial by politicians of citizens right to stand for election and the coungy's right to elect their president. Letter sent to: Sunday Business Post, Irish Times, Sunday Tribune, Irish Catholic, Sunday Independent, Irish Independent, Pat Kenny Show, Liveline, etc on 22/10/97
Editor,
The presidential election process is unconstitutional!
I want to challenge its constitutionality but haven't money or free legal aid!
Only Dana and Derek Nally used the constitutional options correctly. The others were preselected by parties & are seen to represent those parties.
Party supported candidates have a grossly unfair advantage over other candidates.
The Parties are putting forward 3 candidates of their choice. Generally, the odds against anyone else being elected without party support are very high. This has likely ruled out excellent potential candidates.
The peoples choice has been, and is being, subordinated to the parties' choices. (only 3 to 4% of adults are in a party)
A candidate needs only 20 TDs/senators or 4 Councils for nomination. There could be up to 10 nominated by TDs and senators each nominating 1, and another 6 or 8 nominated by councils. Abuse of the procedures until now doesn’t make it right.
Why do parties unconstitutionally, undemocratically, control the choice of president?. Has the Attorney General not a role in this?.
Why didn’t Albert go for 20 TDs when he was challenging his party’s joint sponsorship of John Hume or, later, if he was to be the people’s president?. Why didn’t others?? e.g. the other FF & FG hopefulls
The ridiculous controversy, damning Mary McAleese by association, shows that parties will stoop to anything to have THEIR OWN candidate elected.
The parties (particularly the PDs, Democratic Left, Fine Gael) vilified and harangued John Hume for talking with Jerry Adams to bring about the first peace process. That they would have agreed him as a cross-party choice for president, except for Albert’s pique, implicitly shows their cynical opportunism.
Politicians may have, in their own interest, damaged Mary McAleese’s chances of being a healer of divisions should she be elected. They quickly put the president in his/her box if (s)he puts a foot wrong but, they have commandeered the choice of president from the citizens.
In the current referendum the Govt must give equal weight & financial resources to both arguments as a result of the McKenna judgement in the Divorce referendum process.
In a Presidential election each candidate must, likewise, have a fair and equitable (based on their perceived merits only) chance of election. The parties have ruled that out
What of Govt parties nominating/ supporting/endorsing a candidate. Can Govt, or members of Govt, legally(constitutionally) add their weight to a particular candidate, attend rallies in favour of one candidate? & use state cars etc to attend them.
M Bannotti made a boob questioning the appropriateness of Northerners being candidates and was silenced while J Bruton took up the Adams connection (implicitly it seems, on her behalf) to damage the stronger runner.
Why doesn’t M Bannotti disassociate herself from FG & the ugly campaign being waged by John Bruton against M McAleese using the leaked documents &, probably, exacerbating the harm done by that leak?. D Nally distanced himself when he discovered he was being duped seemingly by the same sources as FG were using to blacken Mc Aleese.
If the Marys & Adi are interested in a democratic election & a fair deal for candidates and electors, why are they prepared to use the grossly unfair advantage of party support. That support virtually eliminates the potential of other runners to get elected &, unconstitutionally, fills a NON-PARTY political office with a PARTY candidate.
If the parties stayed out of the race it could be a democratic election and the person chosen would, more likely, be the peoples choice.
John Fitzgibbon
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (9 of 9)