The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Judges Told to Avoid Saying ?Asylum Seekers? and ?Immigrants? Fri Jul 26, 2024 17:00 | Toby Young
A new edition of the Equal Treatment Bench Book instructs judges to avoid terms such as 'asylum seekers', 'immigrant' and 'gays', which it says can be 'dehumanising'.
The post Judges Told to Avoid Saying ?Asylum Seekers? and ?Immigrants? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum Fri Jul 26, 2024 15:00 | Toby Young
Labour has appointed Becky Francis, an intersectional feminist, to rewrite the national curriculum, which it will then force all schools to teach. Prepare for even more woke claptrap to be shoehorned into the classroom.
The post The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech Fri Jul 26, 2024 13:03 | Toby Young
The Government has just announced it intends to block the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, effectively declaring war on free speech. It's time to join the Free Speech Union and fight back.
The post Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
I Wrote an Article for Forbes Defending J.D. Vance From Accusations of ?Climate Denialism?. Forty Ei... Fri Jul 26, 2024 11:00 | Tilak Doshi
On July 18th, Dr Tilak Doshi wrote an article for Forbes defending J.D. Vance from accusations of 'climate denialism'. 48 hours later, Forbes un-published the article. Read the article on the Daily Sceptic.
The post I Wrote an Article for Forbes Defending J.D. Vance From Accusations of ?Climate Denialism?. Forty Eight Hours Later, Forbes Un-Published the Article and Sacked Me as a Contributor appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Come and See Nick Dixon and me Recording the Weekly Sceptic at the Hippodrome on Monday Fri Jul 26, 2024 09:00 | Toby Young
Tickets are still available to a live recording of the Weekly Sceptic, Britain's only podcast to break into the top five of Apple's podcast chart. It?s at Lola's, the downstairs bar of the Hippodrome on Monday July 29th.
The post Come and See Nick Dixon and me Recording the Weekly Sceptic at the Hippodrome on Monday appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (17 of 17)
Jump To Comment: 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1Who uses inane terms like "Enough Already" which is a gramatical convulsion? It might sound right coming from Brad Pitt on some US blockbuster film but "Enough Already" is a ridiculous term. What does it mean? Sounds like something the upper-class snobs said on the Titanic lifeboats when someone pointed out there was plenty of space for extra passengers. "That's enough already, just get rowin'".
Which part of the phrase "ShelltoSea" do you not understand!!!!!!!!! - The only independent expert report done on the project was done by the CPI(Centre for Public Investigation). Using international experts in the field it highlighted the recklessness and danger of Shell's current plans for extracting the gas and recommended the off-shore option as the optimum development concept!
Mr Lavelle attempts to trot out the usual guff about planning. The pipeline has no planning, neithier does many of the installations on the Bellanaboy site and in Rossport. Shell ploughed a road through protected sand -dunes at Glengad without planning, this and other illegal developments are now the subject of investigation by the Co. Co. and Bord Pleanala. The devlopment consents are also the subject of an ongoing high court action presided over by Ms Justice Laffoy.
Just to give you an idea of what 340 bar pressure actually means:
it is roughly equivalent to the pressure at the bottom of a column of water 3400m high (or 3.4km underwater).
That's serious pressure. Typical pipelines for pumped liquids are suitable for up to about 20 bar. Beyond that you're getting into special pipes.
We in America are struggling to preserve what is left of our own democracy after the plutocrats are done hijacking it for corporate profit. I am saddened to see that even in Ireland/E.U. countries, the public interest is not valued by the government supposedly representing the people who elected it. Corporations should not have the power to jail private property owners with legitimate concern for the safety of their community. The comparison to the pipeline procedures in Norway is eye-opening. What laws limiting corporate power have they got that we don't?
In response to the BTW above, the reason Shell havent' "just bought everyone out" is because not everyone is for sale. Surprise you?
"[T]he public cannot be allowed to empower themselves or take action of this nature..."
You would for example support oppressive laws to prevent people "empowering themselves"? Of course they can't be allowed to question actions taken by the State. Good God, the heavens would fall down!
What right do these people have to think for themselves, rather than accept the word of Government officials? It ought to be outlawed!
Except that every word the Government has said on this issue has been exposed as a lie. Deal with that.
We have adequate precent for corrupt planning decisions. This is no different; the scale is larger, that's all. The Rossport protests are a positive development, a sign that maybe there is a hope for the resurgence of politics among Irish people.
Henry! you are right to be critical of the reasons given by the objectors to the pipeline, especially if the objections do not make sense to you.
In a small way, may I explain the way that I see it. The main anxiety that objectors have, myself included, is that our government seems to ahve abdicated their role as protectors of peoples safety and of the environment. The multi national companies appear to be calling the shots.
The Western People had a very interesting piece last week under the column called the Editor's Chair. Mr Andy Pyle stated in a previous letter to the paper that a similar pipeline to the Rossport one existed in Karsto in Norway. The Western People investigated this claim. Quote: 'The Karsto pipeline is 55mm thick; the Corrib pipeline is 27mm thick. The Karsto pipeline has a miximum operating pressure of 170 bar; the Corrib pipeline is 340 bar. In other words, the Corrib pipeline has twice the operating pressure of Karsto but only half the thickness. Meanwhile, sections of the Karsto pipeline are buried 200m below the ground while sections of the Corrib pipeline are only 1.2m below the ground. And here is the icing on the cake. No new houses are permitted within 200 meters of the Karsto pipeline yet the Corrib pipeline will pass within 70 meters of existing residences and 30 meters from a public road.' Unquote.
Is it any wonder that the resicences of Erris are skeptical of asurances given by Shell etc? The Norwegian Government through their company Statoil etc guarantee A1 Environmental and Safety policies for the Norwegian people. Interestingly, the people of Rossport are behaving in exactly the same manner that the Norwegian Government behaved after been approached by Philips Petroleum (looking for exporation licenses) soon after Gas was found in Groningen(similar rock formation as in the North Sea) in Holland in 1958. They admitted that they knew nothing about oil exploration and asked Philips to wait until they were sure of what they were doing. The Rossport Five in the absense of Irish Government control also just want to be sure that what is being done is in the interest of the safety of their families, neighbours and protects their rich environment.
Ths Irish Government has got to take the lead to protect it's citizens, otherwise they will have to put alot of people in jail again. There are billions of Irish wealth buying up property abroad. Why in God's name can they not do a Maritime Renewal Scheme (similar to the very successful Rural Renewal Schem) and direct some of this wealth towards taking control of Oil/Gas exploration around their coastline?
from afar is that members of the public shut down a 900 million euro project that had clearly being through the numerous planning processes, public hearings etc., was given the green light by the relevant statutory authorities, Mayo Co. Co. and so on
This is completely unacceptable and sets a very dangerous precedent for the government, the public cannot be allowed to empower themselves to take action of this nature,
because i dont agree with someone or something does not give me license to form blockades and put people out of work,
Most of it is either being put in the public domain by Shell and its associates (boo, biased) or by the ShellTo Sea Campaign and their supporters (Boo, biased). So where the bejaysus do folk get this unbiased info?? I reckon you take some from the ShellToSea campaign i.e. the locals concerns for their safety, and the technical stuff from the Shell sources. They must tell the truth in relation to the technical aspects, as this is what would be put in place in the event of a pipeline being built, yes? Many people are making comparisons to the way in which Shell operated in Nigeria which was and is completely reprehensible, but aren't we as a country a little more advanced in relation to planning and safety? Some will doubtless argue otherwise. I reckon the folk who are a whoopin and a hollerin so much about the Rossport situation, but who aren't directly affected by the issue, should focus more on issues like Corrupt Catholic Church, War in Iraq, POWs in Shannon Warport etc. The lads who went to prison seem well able to handle themselves, but the whole situation is gone a bit haywire if you ask me, not that you would cos I'm no expert like.
But lastly, cos I may as well be beating me mickey off the butt of an auld whitethorn bush for all the thanks I'll get, but this reeks of no, not nimbyism, but yes, you guessed it, of BANANAism. Some people just seem to love protesting against anything and its impossible to stop them, especially those with too much time on their hands.
But leaving everything else aside, fair play to the five for sticking to their guns, they truely rock,
(BTW, why haven't Shell just bought everyone out?)
You are referring to your own?
Well said Henry...I agree. Unqualified people making completely spurious arguments and generalisations can only lead to ignorance. unfortunately that is whats happened here.
Why don't you inform yourself about what is really happening, because the ignorance your statements reflect is shocking, given the fact that this issue has been in the public domain for some months.
From what i have read about the subject don't engineers design pipelines to withstand certain tolerances - for example if there is high pressure gas passing through it a pipeline is not only designed to withstand that particular pressure but several times multiples of the minimum tolerance it will actually be used for.
What seems to be happening in Rossport is locals who have no clue about engineering are second guessing the designers of the pipeline. When it is pointed out that they do not have the engineering knowledge to make such a judgement the locals smelt persecution.
The groups name itself implies that they want an off shore gas pipe line built as oppossed to one running through their back garden. These people are not middle class bourgeouis anarchists, they are ordinary farmer types with genuine concerns. :0)
First of all Henry, you won't get much of an understanding from the mainstream media who's coverage of this issue, apart from local media, has been shallow to say the least. Neither could following the 'debate' on this website have led you to the understanding that 'they want NO gaspipe line or refinery to be constructed'.
The Shell to Sea campaign and especially the Rossport Five have always said that they would welcome a clean gas pipeline through Rossport and if a refinery is built at sea, which is the demand of the campaign also Henry, they "will help bring the clean gas in".
Pipeline safety.
There are no assurances that the proposed pipeline will be safe. It's a timebomb in their front gardens. See Dave Aldridges report at www.shelltosea.com, talk to Mike Cunningham ex-Statoil, Padraig Campbell SIPTU, Brian Coyle Engineer, Warner Blau physicist etc etc.
Capping the gas for the future has been discussed but not to the extent that you claim and no decisions have been made. That, in the context which I think you're referring to, namely the 'renegotiation of the original deal'.
Your hypothesis is bullshit and untrue, dunno where you get your info. Inform yourself, search Indymedia and read, study shelltosea.com and then present an argument and be bold about it then, not now with a weak argument.
Go to Rossport and see for yourself.
The problem with piping the gas to an onshore refinery is that it is coming straight out of the ground at high pressue. Such high pressure pipes are untested so although the engineers reckon it would be OK no one knows for sure.
A standard offshore refinery would refine the gas and pump it onshore at a much lower pressure - the sort that is used in the Kinsale pipes. These have been in operation for some years and so are tested.
Basically people in Rossport feel they are the guniepigs in a rather dangerous experiment - and could be incinerated if it goes wrong.
The other problem is the corrupt deal Shell were given in the first place which is taking revenue out of our hospitals and schools. And the fact that the government rewrote the law to allow Sheel CPA's for the pipeline.