The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire
In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire
UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović
US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire
Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović Anti-Empire >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog. We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
National - Event Notice Thursday January 01 1970 After Irish Ferries - The future of Trade Unionism
national |
worker & community struggles and protests |
event notice
Tuesday January 24, 2006 16:49 by Socialist Worker - Socialist worker industrial at swp dot ie 0879090166
![Report this post to the editors Report this post to the editors](../graphics/report.gif)
A one-day seminar
The dispute at Irish Ferries shows the need for a different type of trade unionism.
IBEC, the employers body, did not once condemn the actions of Irish Ferries - even though they wanted to pay workers below the minimum wage - so it makes no sense to regard them as our 'social partners'.
We, therefore invite you to this seminar to discuss Social Partnership, the EU Services Directive, migrant workers and union recruitment and how to build fighting trade unions today. After Irish Ferries
The future of Trade Unionism
A one-day seminar
Saturday 4th Feburary. The Central Hotel,
Exchequer Street, Dublin City Centre
10.30 - 11.00 Registration
Tea/Coffee
11.00 - 13.00 Debate on Social Partnership
Jack O'Connor, President SIPTU
Mick O'Reilly, Regional Secretary ATGWU
13.00 - 14.00 Lunch Break
14.00 - 15.30 Migrant Workers Rights and the EU Services Directive
Tom Tully, Chief Shop Steward,
Irish Ferries; Barbara Muldoon,
Legal Advisor on Immigration;
Bobby Gilmore Chairperson Migrant
Rights Centre
15.45 - 17.30 Building a Fighting Trade Union Movement
Owen McCormack, Busworkers Action Group; Eamonn McNally CWU
Cover charge €5.00
For booking and information contact Brid Smith
Tel: 087 90 90 166 or e-mail: industrial@swp.ie
After Irish Ferries
The future of Trade Unionism
A one-day seminar
The dispute at Irish Ferries shows the need for a different type of trade unionism.
IBEC, the employers body, did not once condemn the actions of Irish Ferries - even though they wanted to pay workers below the minimum wage - so it makes no sense to regard them as our 'social partners'.
Over 150,000 workers came on to the streets and ship officers had to occupy their ship before a bare 'threshold of decency' was established. When it requires 'people power' to win the most basic of rights, then there is something radically wrong with social partnership.
We need a different type of fighting trade unionism which takes up the spirit of December 9th.We need to forge alliances with social movements that are fighting the government's neo-liberal agenda.
A key issue for trade unionists is the way that employers are trying to divide the workforce between migrant and native Irish. They want to intimidate migrants by using work permits to create a form of bonded labour. This tactic threatens the living standards of all workers and must be resisted.
Only fighting unions can recruit tens of thousands of migrant workers into our ranks and make gains for all. We, therefore invite you to this seminar to discuss Social Partnership, the EU Services Directive, migrant workers and union recruitment and how to build fighting trade unions today.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (9 of 9)
Jump To Comment: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1Socialist Democracy have a typically scathing review of the O'Reilly O'Connor debate.
Can someone who was at this meeting post a report?
The SWP used the name of a prominent CWU activist and member of the SP without even telling him his name was on the list.
Typical of the SWP
And people wonder why they can't be trusted.
Sorter,
Eamonn knew nothing about either the meeting or his name being used on any advertisements so wasn't there. But for your info below is a copy of a leaflet he and other An Post activists produced in the run up to the AGM last Sunday, where Eamonn was elected Chairman of the Branch.
_____________________________________________________________
Vote Eamonn McNally for chairperson
Dear colleagues,
The recent collection and delivery deal will have a major impact on all of our wages and working conditions. Senior management and the government have fought for these changes and are seeking more in order to prepare the company for "liberalisation" and privatisation. We are in the middle of the most important period in the history of An Post and how our union responds to these challenges will determine the quality of life for you and future employees.
We are faced with the choice of making major concessions to senior management’s restructuring plans or resisting these changes to protect jobs, wages and conditions. I strongly believe that it was a mistake for our leading union officials to have recommended acceptance of the collection and delivery deal.
In December 2004 An Post members took strike action and marched in the belief we were fighting to save SDS, to get our pay increases with no strings attached and to defeat Curtin and his management’s agenda. Instead of mobilising our members in a campaign to resist management the union leadership put their faith in the LRC. Now look where we have ended up! We face redundancies, major changes in overtime, changes to our routes, and work practices. Management are to be given the power to carry out "time and motion" studies the results of which can completely change your job, and will greatly increase your workload.
Many of the most serious changes have been left open to further negotiations. Our union leadership will say that they will protect our members conditions during these negotiations – but can you trust them to do that after they have spent the last 18 months messing around and have squandered the opportunity to defeat the company? At the end of the day the leadership of the CWU walked away from the fight and have accepted many of the company’s proposals and have left the door open for them to implement even more draconian changes.
We need to elect members to positions in the union who are prepared to stand up to the company and to our full time union officials to defend the jobs, wages and conditions of our members. This is why I am standing for the position of chairperson of our branch at the AGM.
The collection and delivery deal is one part of the management’s overall restructuring plans that aim to make postal workers subsidise the running costs of the company through job cuts, wages cuts and increased productivity. Instead of going along with this agenda the CWU should be campaigning to force the government to provide state funds to subsidise An Post’s social obligation.
Our members are forced to work overtime to make ends meet because our basic pay is so low (now even this overtime is threatened by the new deal). Our union officials should be taking on the company in a campaign to get us a decent basic wage.
In the last 18 months the CWU leadership has shown itself to be incapable of defending our jobs and conditions. The "partnership" approach has failed and has led to us being sold-out. During the recent ballot many of our members around the country were not fully informed of the terms of the collection and delivery deal nor were they given the opportunity to discuss and debate it. We cannot allow these undemocratic practices to continue. Postal workers need a democratic, fighting union to defend their jobs and conditions and to fight for the future of our publicly owned postal service.
I stand for the regular election of our full time union officials and that they should be paid the average wage of the members they represent. Only then can we ensure that we have full time officials who are accountable to the members and will be prepared to take a militant stance in the face of the company’s attacks.
our AGM.
If elected I will campaign for:
The branch officers to be fully involved in collection and delivery negotiations.
Resistance to changes to our work practices and conditions.
To protect the take home pay of members and to campaign for a radical increase in our basic pay.
To develop better communications in the branch so that all members will be fully informed.
For the regular election of full time officials, to receive the average pay of our members.
To work with other members throughout the union to build a campaign for radical change in the CWU to transform it into a democratic, fighting union that defends and fights for our rights.
Another SWP Front bites the dust. And dust will gather on it until its suddenly ressurected again. Bit like the ANL, any reports of its existence lately?
Sorry I couldn't make it to your event. I wanted to go because as a postal worker I was very interested in hearing what Eamonn McNally had to say about the situation in An Post. Can anyone enlighten me?
How did it go?
The lack of comments is instructive in itself. The future of unions is in the bin.
On how the event went?