Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political Sat Jan 11, 2025 17:00 | Noah Carl Science, nominally the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, is at it again. In November, they published an editorial saying that scientists need to be even more political than they already are.
The post Top Journal: Scientists Should Be More, Not Less, Political appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure Sat Jan 11, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones BlackRock, the world's biggest asset manager, is abandoning the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative after coming under pressure from Republican politicians over its support for woke climate policies.
The post BlackRock Quits Net Zero Asset Managers Under Republican Pressure appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle Sat Jan 11, 2025 13:00 | Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson write about the appalling treatment of Covid vaccine whistleblower Dr Byram Bridle, the Canadian immunologist who was removed from duties for raising the alarm about the vaccine.
The post The Appalling Treatment of Covid Vaccine Whistleblower Dr. Byram Bridle appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?High Chance? Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts Sat Jan 11, 2025 11:00 | Will Jones There is a "high chance" that Rachel Reeves will be forced to announce emergency?spending cuts?this spring, Barclay's Chief Economist has said, as borrowing costs surged again on Friday.
The post “High Chance” Reeves Will be Forced into Emergency Spending Cuts appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine Sat Jan 11, 2025 09:00 | Dr Copernicus Dr. Daniel Armstrong has had his name erased from the U.K. Medical Register and been barred from practice for making a video in which he argued that the Covid vaccines are unsafe, untested and cause harm.
The post Covid Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?114-115 Fri Jan 10, 2025 14:04 | en
End of Russian gas transit via Ukraine to the EU Fri Jan 10, 2025 13:45 | en
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Red Banner magazine ceases publication.
national |
anti-capitalism |
press release
Thursday June 07, 2007 16:05 by Red Banner editorial board - Red Banner magazine
Editorial board of Red Banner magazine ceases publication.
3rd June 2007
The editorial board of Red Banner has decided to cease publication of the magazine and to incorporate it into a proposed new publication in the future.
Since the editorial board meeting of 29th March, a board member, solely on his own initiative with the subsequent support of a second board member, has sought to exclude another board member from the editorial board. Since 8th May he has sought to exclude yet another member. He then refused to conduct editorial business or to agree to the convening of editorial meetings, bringing work on issue No. 28 of Red Banner to a halt.
In order to address the situation and to discuss and make decisions on the future of the magazine, we called a meeting of the five members of the editorial board for Monday 28th May.
Neither of the other two board members attended or acknowledged notice of the meeting.
At that meeting the editorial board resolved:
“…that the only option is to wrap up the magazine. [‘X’s] determination to impose his will on the editorial board, the exclusion and attempted exclusion of two board members and the practical paralysis that [‘X’] has now imposed on the production of the magazine, make it impossible to carry on.
This inflexibility also makes it impossible to envisage down the line any editorial and political changes needed to develop the magazine. So it is timely for a new, or two new, publications to succeed Red Banner. It is the intention of the editorial board to begin discussions among Red Banner readers and supporters and others on the left with a view to a new publication, incorporating Red Banner and its original spirit.
Red Banner has maintained publication, respect and a small readership for ten years, as the only independent socialist publication in print that allowed for the free and open exchange of socialist ideas in considered, extensive and detailed form. It could not have done so for one year without the dedication of the two editorial board members who have now brought Red Banner to a standstill. Despite our unfortunately irreconcilable differences we salute their past indispensability to Red Banner and their continued work for the oppressed and for socialism.
With a special irony in the case of Red Banner, the left has disgraced itself again by splitting. Red Banner, which emerged as an alternative to sectarianism, to champion a new politics, has fallen victim to intolerance and overbearance on its own editorial board and produced another dispute between factions.
We request the other editorial board members to now make all the assets of Red Banner available to the new publication or publications. We undertake to honour subscriptions to Red Banner, or to refund the money, and we hope that the readers, subscribers and writers of Red Banner will carry their support over to its proposed successor.”
The editorial board sent its resolution to the two missing board members and set about reporting the full and detailed resolution to the subscribers, contributors and supporters of Red Banner. We are now doing so with the updated position, including the paragraph below. Before our resolution was circulated one of us received in the post on 31st May a copy of Issue 28 of Red Banner, produced (we guess) by the other two board members. Now they have advertised Issue 28 on Indymedia and a Red Banner website has been constructed and launched. We are compelled to make a public statement.
The narrative is now complete: the exclusion of first one, then two, non-compliant editorial members, has now extended to all three. The editorial work for Issue No.28 has not been halted at all, just carried out by a minority on the editorial board with the exclusion of the members unacceptable to them, while boycotting a validly convened editorial meeting and whatever decisions it might make. The board decided to cease publication. Issue No.28 is a pirate issue. Its publishers should now comply with the clear intentions of the editorial board, produce their own publication and desist from their usurpation of Red Banner.
Des Derwin
John Meehan
Brendan Young.
Red Banner Editorial Board members.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (37 of 37)