|
|
Worker & Community Struggles and Protests
Blog Feeds
Anti-Empire
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Human Rights in IrelandIndymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
|
Assembly Executive announces imposition of water charges national |
worker & community struggles and protests |
news report
 Monday October 22, 2007 13:37 by a - wwpc wewontpay at btconnect dot com
 We Won't Pay Campaign initial reaction The We Won't Pay Campaign has reacted to today's announcement from Minister for Regional Development Conor Murphy claiming the Executive has decided to 'introduce water charges through the back door' by adding a specific charge for water in the rates on top of what every household already pays for water. Spokesperson Pat Lawlor commented "The Independent Review Panel stated that on average we already pay £160 per year for water. While we believe the real figure may actually be considerably more, it is nonetheless accpeted that we do pay for water through the rates. What the Executive has decided is that each household should pay an additional payment of £145 from April 2009 on top of what we already pay. This is clearly double taxation, and no amount of spin from the Executive can hide that fact. ' |
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 2 1This is nonsense (which I suppose should be expected from the Socialist Party). Firstly, it's not a double tax because it's only a raise in the rates bill. The opposition to the double tax came about because of the plan to introduce a separate water charge. This charge would have seen money that should've went with the rest of the rates bill money go into the hands of NI Water, a GoCo set up by the British government that would have eventually been sold off to a private company. By preventing the introduction of a separate charge, the water privatisation agenda has certainly been dealt a blow.
There are questions around this rise in the rates bill though. How much will truly be needed for investment in the water and sewage infrastructure to prevent the threatened EU fines? etc.
But some good news has definitely come from Stormont if water is to be kept in public hands. And upsetting some opportunist ultra-leftists isn't such a bad thing either.
All the main political parties issued anti-water charges manifestos before the last election. What made them change their minds? Must be some mistake...
Well, just remember: when they send you a water bill, bin it. The minute they break their manifesto pledges, it ceases to be a political issue, and direct action becomes the only action.