Secretive Irish Climate Science Denier Group Steps Up 'Bizarre' Parliamentary Lobbying 22:27 Sep 27 0 comments
EU Commission proposes new strict EU-wide rules on single-use plastics 12:29 May 29 0 comments
Protecting WIldlife in Ireland from Hedge Cutting and Gorse Burning 23:37 Feb 23 0 comments
WRECK THE « CLIMATE CHANCE » SUMMIT! At Nantes, France, from 26 to 28 September 2016 20:04 Jul 17 0 comments
Why the corporate capture of COP21 means we must Kick Big Polluters Out of climate policy 22:47 Dec 03 3 commentsmore >>
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Kurds face stark options after US pullback Mon Oct 14, 2019 20:11 | amarynth
Behind Hong Kong?s black terror Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:12 | amarynth
Washington abandons its Kurdish proxies as Ankara and Damascus step in Sun Oct 13, 2019 21:38 | The Saker
The Terrorists Among US10| The IO Echo Chamber Scott Shane Joel Harding Sun Oct 13, 2019 21:35 | The Saker
President Putin Interview with Al Arabiya, Sky News Arabia and RT Arabic Sun Oct 13, 2019 16:54 | Scott
A Blog About Human Rights
US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights
Fijian women still face Human Rights violations Mon Aug 26, 2019 18:49 | Human Rights
Saudi Human Rights Violation Fri Aug 09, 2019 20:41 | Human Rights
China?s LGBT Community Mon Apr 15, 2019 19:19 | Human Rights
High Court refers case to Court of Justice of the EU over Courts Service’s refusal to provide public access to litigation documents
national | environment | press release Sunday September 08, 2019 21:46 by foie - Friends of the Irish Environment
PRESS RELEASE FRIENDS OF THE IRISH ENVIRONMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
High Court refers case to Court of Justice of the EU over Irish Courts Service’s refusal to provide public access to litigation documents
The Courts Service of Ireland maintains a policy that only the parties to litigation and their lawyers may obtain access to litigation documents on request (e.g. statements of grounds/defence, affidavits, written submissions, court orders, etc.), with access being granted in addition to “bona fide members of the press”.
The result is that while the public is generally allowed to sit through and take notes of most civil proceedings if they are in a position to attend court in person, the public may not generally obtain access to the documents that parties’ lawyers and the judge are referring to in court, even where the documents are produced for the State or for public bodies using public funds.
This inaccessibility means that litigants in subsequent similar cases and other interested persons cannot benefit from direct knowledge of the previous arguments and evidence presented or check arguments for consistency over time. It also means that lawyers may have to effectively reinvent the wheel each time a new case is taken.
In 2016 FIE wrote to the Courts Service requesting access to the documents in respect of an environmental case that had been heard by the High Court in which FIE had not participated but in which it had an interest in the arguments made. FIE cited the Aarhus Convention and EU/Irish law implementing that Convention in its request. The Courts Service reiterated its policy and refused access to the documents. FIE appealed the Courts Service’s decision to the Commissioner for Environmental Information, who ruled in favour of the Courts Service in 2017.
FIE appealed the Commissioner for Environmental Information’s decision to the High Court in September 2017. After a two-day hearing in April 2019, Ms. Justice O’Regan decided to adjourn the case in order to ask the Court of Justice of the EU for a preliminary ruling on a point of interpretation of EU law.
The question relates to the meaning of acting in a “judicial capacity” for the purpose of EU Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information. Where a body is acting in a judicial capacity, Member States may exclude them from the definition of “public authority”; public authorities are in principle open to access to environmental information requests pursuant to the Directive, subject to limited exceptions.
FIE argued in its case before the High Court that there is a direct read-across from an earlier judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU, relating to acting in a “legislative capacity”. That case decided that once the legislative process has ended the body in question can no longer be said to be acting in a legislative capacity and so must in principle be open to an access to environmental information request. The same must be true, FIE argues, of acting in a “judicial capacity” in that once the case in question has concluded (with a judgment and no appeal), the body in question is no longer acting in a judicial capacity in holding the documents.
The Commissioner for Environmental Information and the Courts Service maintain that FIE is not entitled to access the litigation documents in question, and that in controlling access to litigation documents the Courts Service, acting on behalf of the judiciary, acts indefinitely in a judicial capacity, even after a case has ended with no appeal.
The case has been allocated case number C-470/19 by the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, and a hearing date is awaited.
Commenting on the High Court’s decision to refer the case to the Court of Justice, FIE director Tony Lowes commented:
“The courts have shown themselves much more willing in recent years to make preliminary references on points of interpretation of EU law. We are very happy that this crucial point of transparency law will be determined by the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, ensuring a consistent interpretation across all EU Member States.'
FIE has other important judgments and hearings pending before the courts:
'This run of vital cases just goes to show how important public interest environmental litigation can be', Mr. Lowes said.
FIE is represented by O’Connell and Clarke Solicitors instructing John Kenny BL and Jerry Healy SC.ENDS
1. The High Court’s request for a preliminary ruling in FIE’s access to litigation documents case is available HERE.https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1_Bbh7gmHCvNFpfZm9KMmxqN0RvRG1WaGE5elBlbzJtd2k4
2. The “legislative capacity” case that FIE argues can be read-across from is Case C-204/09 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=119426&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=5718369 Flachglas Torgau:
3. The Commissioner for Environmental Information’s July 2017 decision, which FIE appealed to the High Court resulting in the present preliminary reference, is HERE. https://www.ocei.ie/decisions/dCEI_16_0038-Friends-of-the-Irish-E/index.xml
4. The website for the challenge to woody biomass is HERE. http://eubiomasscase.org/the-case/
Tony Lowes: 087 2176316
Irish language: David Healy 087 6178852
This Press Release