Who put the gold in the Golden Jubilee?

Wednesday June 12, 2002 15:45

by Finghin - Socialist Youth

An interesting look at the monarchy in the UK

THIS WEEKEND'S Golden Jubilee celebrations survived a crisis - Buckingham Palace started burning down. After the public were evacuated and firefighters efficiently got the blaze under control, TV commentators asked the question on everyone's lips: "Has anything expensive got scorched?"

Contrary to some press reports, the Queen and her extended family are not skint - the royal household has personal wealth in the billions.

The Queen's private wealth is valued at ｣1.15 billion, excluding royal palaces and property "held in trust for the nation" (most of which never sees the light of day).

These include the world's largest private art collection, whose books of Leonardo 'cartoons' are valued at ｣3.22 billion. The stones in the Crown jewels are priceless - the most prestigious being worth at least ｣80 million.

The royal estate owns 285 houses and apartments together with large parts of Britain. (Another four billionaire aristocratic families own huge and very profitable sections of London. While 99.9% live on just 9% of Britain's land mass, the other 0.1% own much of the rest).

The Queen's own properties such as Sandringham and Balmoral are worth ｣61 million. Income from the Duchy of Lancaster and Duchy of Cornwall give the royals extra spare cash.

Her Majesty and her advisers invest in anything which makes money. Ethical investors they're not. The privy purse private estates pension fund holds shares in tobacco firms and arms manufacturers.

The royal coffers had about ｣20 million in 1952. From then up to 1992 a secret deal, letting the Queen reclaim tax on dividends and interest from investments, saved her about ｣1 billion.

Power and wealth
It's hard to get the whole truth - there's a lot of secrecy around about these finances. But her racehorses alone are worth ｣3.6 million, her inherited stamp collection ｣102 million, her 30 furs (kept in a fridge at Buckingham Palace) are worth ｣1 million, her wine stock ｣2 million, cars ｣7 million. Wedding presents worth ｣2 million in 1947 (austerity days for some) are now worth ｣50 million.

The Queen has power as well as riches. She signs assent to parliamentary bills, can appoint the Prime Minister and dissolve parliament. Armed forces personnel, judges, MPs etc swear allegiance to her rather than the elected parliament.

When push comes to shove, these powers could be used to dismiss a government and even use the armed forces against anyone who failed to uphold the ruling class's interests.

In recent years, this family's antics have made more and more people ask why they still command such wealth and power. We call for the abolition of the monarchy, and all other feudal relics and symbols of privilege.

6 June 2002
This article first appeared in The Socialist, paper of the England and Wales section of the CWI.

save preference

Comments (5 of 5)

The Queen has no power

by clinton

Wed Jun 12, 2002 16:02

"The Queen has power as well as riches. She signs assent to parliamentary bills, can appoint the Prime Minister and dissolve parliament. Armed forces personnel, judges, MPs etc swear allegiance to her rather than the elected parliament.
When push comes to shove, these powers could be used to dismiss a government and even use the armed forces against anyone who failed to uphold the ruling class's interests"

These "powers" are much the same as those held by the President in the Republic of Ireland. The Queen can dissolve Parliament only in the way Mary McAleese dissolves the Dail. She can't do it in any undemocratic nature and start her own dictatorship. Likewise for the army. I agree that the Queens personal wealth is sickening, but there is no point in pretending that she has any power, because she really doesn't

australia

by henry - socialist party

Wed Jun 12, 2002 17:29

Didn't the queens man in australia disolve a left wing government in 1974? if anyone knows the story please fill us in.

But anyway, money and wealth is power she has plenty of both!!!!

The Queen...

by firstmistress

Wed Jun 12, 2002 23:21

Is Great (not)

Why oh why do the British people put up with such parasites as the monarchy?
Can somebody please answer this simple question...

Why?

by Fenian

Thu Jun 13, 2002 01:15

Why do Irish shoneens like (Sir) Tony O'Reilly accept honours and knighthoods from Mrs. Liz Windsor, thus legitimizing her and her large dysfunctional welfare family?

by Finghin

Wed Jun 19, 2002 16:03

The Queen may not have many obvious powers, but in a time of crisis for capitalism the monarchy could be used by the capitalist class to rule. THe British government is technically a group of advisors to the Queen, if a socialist or radical reformis government were to be elected in Britain, capitalism may choose to rule through the monarchy.

In reply to 'Fenian', nobody should accept hounors from the British or any other Monarchy. It is not right for Irish or English people to accept such titles. The monarchy is just as much an enemy to working people in Britain as it is to working people elsewhere in the world.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Human Rights in Ireland

Lockdown Skeptics

Who put the gold in the Golden Jubilee?

Comments (5 of 5)