Rights, Freedoms and Repression
Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Human Rights in IrelandIndymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Lockdown Skeptics
|
EU passes Data Retention act SEC(2005) 1131![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Start proxying and "purporting"! The Commission has passed a directive which allows the retention of "traffic data" for the purposes of national security and safety. This is explicitly /not/ supposed to apply to the contents of electronic communications (which includes voice calls) but instead to the origins, times and endpoints of communications and probably to any further location information (such as is obtainable with cellphone calls). Specifically (Article 4 pg. 13):
The above private information about you will be archived officially for up to a year without you being accused or suspected of a crime (I can't see what the length of retention limits are for data that law enforcement claims /is/ needed as evidence). One of the sections of the directive discusses the need to retain data for analysis in "complex crimes" for years and presents the relevant counter arguments as being: 1)cost to carriers/ISPs and 2)privacy. The "compromise" worked out is retention for 1 year for telephonic communications and 6 months for "Internet usage". The cited legal basis is Article 95 of the EC Treaty and the fact that it is worded as a directive rather than a regulation allows the prinicple of subsidiarity to provide an amount of variation in implementation within each state. Specifically the member states can determine for themselves which authorities have access to the data. They argue that they've reached a balance between privacy and "security needs" but present no information about what metrics were used (how could they be?) in this determination: in other words they pulled this supposed balance out of their ass. I wonder what they'll start arguing that VOIP is telephonic not Internet? |
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)