Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy
Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy
It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy
Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left
Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy Human Rights in Ireland >>
The Democratic Party Clown Show Continues, With Giggles Replacing Bozo Thu Jul 25, 2024 13:00 | Tony Morrison Biden's sudden exit and the canonisation of his hopeless VP is a dismal chapter in American politics ? one that will further erode trust in the democratic process, says Tony Morrison.
The post The Democratic Party Clown Show Continues, With Giggles Replacing Bozo appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Climate Change? Used to Justify Government?s Record ?Investment? in Renewables. Cui Bono? Not the T... Thu Jul 25, 2024 11:05 | Richard Eldred The Government is using the excuse of 'climate change' to justify the largest taxpayer 'investment' in wind and solar farms in British history.
The post ?Climate Change? Used to Justify Government?s Record ?Investment? in Renewables. Cui Bono? Not the Taxpayer appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Conservative Party Fought Against the Blob and Lost Thu Jul 25, 2024 09:00 | J. Sorel What happened in Britain during the years 2018-24 wasn?t the philosophical defeat of 'Toryism'. It was a Battle Royal with the Blob that the British Right fought and lost, decisively, says J. Sorel.
The post The Conservative Party Fought Against the Blob and Lost appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
In Episode 8 of the Sceptic: Dr David Livermore on Doubts About Lucy Letby?s Guilt, Dr Angus Dalglei... Thu Jul 25, 2024 07:00 | Will Jones In Episode 8 of the Sceptic, Laurie Wastell talks to David Livermore on doubts about Lucy Letby's guilt, Angus Dalgleish on the Covid Inquiry's criticism of lockdown and Steven Tucker on immigration and Michel Houellebecq.
The post In Episode 8 of the Sceptic: Dr David Livermore on Doubts About Lucy Letby’s Guilt, Dr Angus Dalgleish on the Covid Inquiry’s Criticism of Lockdown and Steven Tucker on Immigration and Michel Houellebecq appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Jul 25, 2024 01:14 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en
Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en
Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en
Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Anarchism and Nationalisation
national |
anti-capitalism |
opinion/analysis
Tuesday November 27, 2007 21:09 by Alan MacSimóin - WSM
Can anarchists support nationalisation?
What should happen to the €51bn gasfield off Rossport? Let Shell keep it and let the fat cats get fatter? Try to make Bertie’s government nationalise it and use the wealth for our benefit? Is that something which anarchists would oppose? At a time when the dominant economic thought is to privatise everything in sight, it would take quite some pressure to make them nationalise anything, let alone something they handed over (in return for a dig out’?) to a mammoth multinational. A lot more than petitions, publicity stunts, and a few marches would be required. We are looking at tens of thousands on the streets, probably some civil disobedience and maybe even selective strike action.
So, it would take a large and assertive movement, with very widespread support to force government to take over the Corrib gasfield. Not an easy task, but there is nothing that says it’s impossible. If enough people are involved in campaigning and are determined to not always be limited to ineffective means of protest it can be done.
But what’s the point? We would have as much chance of getting something we need from the extra cash as Bertie has of remembering his bank accounts. Left to their own devices they would spend little, if any, of the extra revenue on useful things like reopening hospital wards or building affordable housing. They would be far more likely to use it to finance more ‘incentives’ and tax cuts for their wealthy pals.
For the WSM, the important point is that if nationalisation were to be won by a large and active movement of working people, that same movement would have the will and confidence to force the government to spend at least some of the extra cash on socially useful projects.
It would be a small reform, and it would not be a secure one. The government and companies like Shell would be quick to look for ways to overturn the decision and privatise the new state company.
But it would be a reform, one worth supporting. By bringing together the questions of nationalising oil & gas resources and how the extra money should be spent, we move that little bit closer to asserting working class interests in opposition to the rights of property. And that’s pretty much it.
State ownership has nothing to do with socialism. There was a fair bit of state ownership in Britain up to the 1980s (coal, rail, post, car assembly, electricity, health, steel, phones, and much more). Not a lot of equality, workers’ control, or anything we associate with socialism, was to be found.
Well, what about ‘communist’ Russia, where the state owned all the industries? A dictatorship where there was just one boss, the state. No real trade unions, a conscript army, no political freedom, gross inequality of wealth between Party leaders and the working class.
Far from having anything to do with even the most warped view of socialism, Russia was ruled by a capitalist class. Instead of the private sector type of capitalism we live under, Russians lived under ‘state capitalism’. And under both types of capitalism a small ruling class lived the high life by leeching off the work of the vast majority.
Nationalisation takes us no nearer to socialism than does private capitalist ownership. If you want to get rid of the division of people into bosses and workers, it matters little whether your boss is Tony O’Reilly or the State – you still have a boss.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7I seem to remember that the locals were fearful that the pipeline and refinery would explode in an accident?
What's the contradiction? Locals are concerned about safety and everyone should be concerned about the robbery of gas that's under way. http://www.indymedia.ie/article/81708
One of the best arguments in support of genuine Anarchism was given on radio recently from a very unlikely source.
http://www.ucd.ie/philosophy/staff/casey_gerard.htm
“Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect” - Peter
Caseys a right wing libertarian type in the sense that he's against state regulation on things like employers & redistributive tax policies etc but he has no problem using the state to force women to remain pregnant against their wishes. He also founded the Christian Solidarity Party.
Okay, I have to admit I'm a bit new to all this anarchism lark, but just from having read the FAQ, this seems a little contradictory. Maybe you know better but I would have thought you'd be against nationalisation AND privatisation.
Right wing and left wing liberterians have so much in common. Both focus their politics on the individual and both are hostile to state involvement.
Gaz B will now tell us that they come at from different angles etc. But the core of their programme is the same.
Ron: Right wing and left wing liberterians have so much in common. Both focus their politics on the individual and both are hostile to state involvement. Gaz B will now tell us that they come at from different angles etc. But the core of their programme is the same.
Except that they not the same and left libertarians do not focus their politics on the individual at the expense of collective action. In fact, anarchism sees change coming about as working people struggle together. Moreover, anarchists, drawing from Bakunin, have seen humans as social animals, whose full individuality is expressed in social, collective settings.
This is quite separate from the issue of the state, which is merely one form of regulating society, a form that ensures divisions into classes, the ruling elite and working people, as well as the systematic exploitation of the latter. There are plenty of methods of collective organising that don't involve a top-down, bureaucratic system for which the state is so distinctive.