Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Fri Jan 10, 2025 01:00 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Cost of Facebook?s Now-Repudiated Censorship Thu Jan 09, 2025 20:00 | Josh Stylman and Jeffrey Tucker Mark Zuckerberg's repudiation of Covid-era censorship is welcome. But it's not enough, say Josh Stylman and Jeffrey Tucker. Without a public reckoning they will just do it all again when a cause seems urgent enough.
The post The Cost of Facebook’s Now-Repudiated Censorship appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Labour?s War Against the Past Thu Jan 09, 2025 17:46 | Dr Nicholas Tate Labour is engaged in an all-out assault on the past. From schools to immigration, inheritance tax to the House of Lords, this radical Left-wing Government is waging war on British culture, says Dr Nicholas Tate.
The post Labour’s War Against the Past appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Britain ?Came Within Whisker of Blackouts? Yesterday Thu Jan 09, 2025 15:16 | Will Jones Britain came "within a whisker of blackouts" on Wednesday after plunging temperatures and?low wind power generation?left electricity grid operators struggling to keep the lights on.
The post Britain “Came Within Whisker of Blackouts” Yesterday appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Where is Rachel Reeves? Thu Jan 09, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones Bond yields are soaring to their highest levels in 30 years and sterling is sliding, but the Chancellor is nowhere to be seen. Where is Rachel Reeves and why won't she address the markets her failed Budget has spooked?
The post Where is Rachel Reeves? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
After Iraq, Libya, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, the Pentagon attacks Yemen, by Thier... Tue Jan 07, 2025 06:58 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
Resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:08 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Religion: What is going on in the church today.
international |
rights, freedoms and repression |
opinion/analysis
Monday January 14, 2008 23:58 by Seamus Power. - Victims of the Legal Profession Society
What is going on in the church today.
Institutionalised religion is concerned in retaining control: the reality of power is more important than the prospect of exploring multiple realities. Anything new or different raises the alarm bells.
The words of church officials come from dogma not from the heart, influenced by tradition, not intuition.
While civil law and common law have different terms of reference the principles underlining both disciplines are very much the same. Rules, laws and regulations are designed to define the conduct of the citizen and devotee. This adherence to a set standard often works against the greater good, this is especially so with regard to religion.
Religion plays a major role in the world today. It controls the minds of billions, underpins many political ideologies and shapes events in almost every part of the globe. Belief in the supernatural influences individual behaviour, culture, the arts and music. Very few activities are outside its remit. It cuts to the very heart of human affairs and most people in some form or other rely on its guidance and reassurance. It is the one phenomena that unites all of humanity, but at what cost?
Religion today is far removed from the ideas of its founding fathers. The institution now takes precedence and dogmas have formed and hardened with the passage of time. These beliefs often bear little resemblance to what was practiced in the early days. Superficiality has taken over and the core message is often lost. Religion to many has become just another consumer product defined by the expedient of the time. Today religion accommodates the world more often than it inspires it.
The ancient practitioners understood reality and the subtleties of the unknown. They connected with other worldly energies and gave meaning to the ordinary. The known and the unknown blended into one and the mysteries of the universe were sensed, if not understood. The seers and the healers could penetrate into different realms of consciousness; their revelations were inspiring and practical, not like today.
Modern religious diktats often have little relevancy to what is happening in the world. The words of church officials come from dogma not from the heart, influenced by tradition, not intuition. Only those that can feel can reveal, a select few. These are gifted people with certain skills and abilities. They are found in all places and in every strand of society. They have little say today, institutionalised religion dominates.
Its functionaries are trained in dogma and tradition. They learn from ancient books and scribes. They reflect on the wisdom of the past, but can offer little useful advice today. They repeat the words of the founding visionaries but do not have enough insight to change the narrative. Only those that have contact with the unknown can act as an intermediary: they can bridge the gap between humanity and divinity, a vital task but one largely ignored today.
Modern religions are based on ancient truths, idioms that have little application today. Church functionaries act as bureaucrats, they implement the rules, preserve the past, and keep the system intact. Religions today rather than challenge the world, compliment it. The political system would not survive without ecclesiastical support. It is the backbone of the modern dilemma. The poor will be always there, it couldn’t be otherwise.
Had institutionalised religion not taken control and had ancient practices remained intact, the world would be a different place today. The ministers, mullahs that instruct the masses are bureaucrats not visionaries, they learn from man not mystery. They connect with the past, not with the unknown. Religion is not a force for change, it has entrapped the spirit. Ancient truths and wisdom are tied up in ecclesiastical bureaucracy.
Institutionalised religion is concerned in retaining control: the reality of power is more important than the prospect of exploring multiple realities. Anything new or different raises the alarm bells. A structure built on illusions cannot sustain the threat of fresh thinking. There is no place for the shaman or the wise man. The fixed idea is crucial, everything hangs from this. A litany of encyclicals, edicts and pronouncements define church policy, the institution takes root and big power follows.
If there was no institutionalised religion today the world might be better for it. The seers and healers would return and the human spirit would be enlivened again. The intermediaries without clerical garb would connect the known with the unknown and the mysteries of the universe would infuse the ordinary. Everything would take on a new meaning and make more sense. The ignorance and confusion that props up the institutional system would dissipate.
Bureaucrats and religious functionaries without insight or special gifts would disappear. The world would return to its ordinary level, dignified, silent and serene. The tyranny of religious paraphernalia would be over, the poor might then inherit the earth or at least their rights, today, not in some cloudy deferred mystical future.
The new church or gathering would consist of healers, visionaries, prophets and wise men. They would be part of the community not the basis for an institution. They would confront events in the world, not condone them, change rather than consolidate being the operative word. Belief would be based on insight not dogma. People could see for themselves and understand the energies that shape events.
Direct contact with the unknown, no need therefore for official church intermediaries. In this way power returns to the individual. It is this prospect more that any other that so disturbs the religious empires of the modern era.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)