Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Schools Tell 14 Year-Old Boys How to ?Safely Choke Their Girlfriends During Sex? Mon Apr 21, 2025 19:00 | Will Jones
A council-funded sex education presentation shown in schools to teenagers as young as 14 has told them how to 'safely' choking their girlfriends during sex, saying it must always be done "with consent".
The post Schools Tell 14 Year-Old Boys How to “Safely Choke Their Girlfriends During Sex” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Covid Vaccine Pregnancy Study Should Have Us Worried Mon Apr 21, 2025 17:00 | Dr Raphael Lataster
A major study has been published in Paediatrics, apparently showing that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe in pregnancy. But Dr Raphael Lataster thinks the study is flawed, and now the journal has published his response.
The post Covid Vaccine Pregnancy Study Should Have Us Worried appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
No 10: We Won?t Stop Pro-Trans Plotting Ministers Mon Apr 21, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones
Keir Starmer has refused to stop a plot by Ministers including Sir Chris Bryant and Dame Angela Eagle to thwart last week?s?Supreme Court ruling?that trans women are not legally women.
The post No 10: We Won’t Stop Pro-Trans Plotting Ministers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Meet the Ecosexuals: People Who Have Sex With Trees, Mud and Lumps of Coal to Somehow Save the Plane... Mon Apr 21, 2025 13:00 | Steven Tucker
Meet the ecosexuals: people who have sex with trees, mud and lumps of coal to save the planet. Lauded by the likes of the Guardian and Teen Vogue, the crazy green fringes are hitting the mainstream, says Steven Tucker.
The post Meet the Ecosexuals: People Who Have Sex With Trees, Mud and Lumps of Coal to Somehow Save the Planet appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
UK in Race to Opt Out of WHO Lockdown Powers Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:06 | Will Jones
Britain has just weeks to escape new powers allowing the World Health Organisation to recommend?imposing lockdowns in future pandemics, a group of MPs and peers has warned.
The post UK in Race to Opt Out of WHO Lockdown Powers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
wicklow |
miscellaneous |
news report
Monday April 21, 2008 15:22
by Anti-Fascist
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6Why exactly were they charged with disturbing the peace or displaying abusive symbols if:
a) someone would have had to deliberately travel a mile off the main road just to see them - presuming they could find them, and actually knew they were there, since they didn't advertise and literally went out of their way to not be in public;
b) the court seemed unsure what all the symbols actually meant;
(And this would be the point where someone says "No fascists for platforms" or whatever, but seriously: how is this not the equivalent of being prosecuted for a private Thoughtcrime?)
It hardly fits the definition of between consenting adults in private if its outdoors FFS
"hardly private if outdoors"
That's not a question with a CLEAR anwser and legally depends upon the rules for the jurisdiction.
For example, here in the States the rule followed by most states is:
a) POTENTIAL public doesn't count. You can't be charged with doing something "in public" unless there is at least one member of the public who could object (need not necessarily be the person objecting). It's not "in public" unless there actually is some "public" presence.
b) The police themselves do not count as "members of the public" for the purposes of this except possibly if their appearance on the scene was incidental (say an off duty police person going for a hike in the woods stumbles across ......).
c) For the purposes of "being visible" optical aids do not count. Can't say "person exposing themselves in public because visible with a good enough telescope."
But I haven't the foggiest what might be the rules in Ireland. Our rules here are based upon the concept EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY. Yours might be based upon something else entirely.
I "deliberately" go a mile off the main road regularly and would be horrified to discover this kind of a display where I hike, typically in areas like this. It is a public place in every sense of the word and these thugs deserved what they got. From my understanding one of them has reoffended recently in the Arklow area
If I stumbled unexpectedly across a group of teenagers skinnydipping in the evening at a beach, could I report them for breach of the peace?
Bashful-
A little different circumstance, but I suppose you could. I think its called indecency or something.
No Clever Name-(sorta a clever name in itself though)
a) Just because it isn't in the centre of Dublin, doesn't mean its not in a public place. Wasn't so private that someone did notice them and called the gardai.
b) I'm sure most people wouldn't get the 777 and white power symbols, but the swastika? In any case, is it inoffensive if only the jury doesn't know what they mean? If you fill a jury with hindus is a neo-nazi holding up a swastika suddenly inoffensive?
"how is this not the equivalent of being prosecuted for a private Thoughtcrime?"
Oooh, too much 1984 for you.
Seems to me that you are a little over-sympathetic to their cause.
If I was taking a stroll through the woods and came across a bunch of guys in military dress with swastika banners, I would shit a brick. I would never go walking in those woods again. I would certainly find it threatening, insulting and abusive.