32CSM no to Lisbon Campaign

national | racism & migration related issues | other press

Tuesday May 06, 2008 15:13

by The Sovereign Nation - 32 County Sovereignty Movement

The 32 County Sovereignty Movement are campaigning for a NO vote in theupcoming referendum on the Lisbon Treaty,

As Irish republican separatists the 32CSM deem it imperative that the issues of Irish National Sovereignty and Partition be at the forefront of republican objections to the proposed EU Constitution. Equally we deem it imperative that the broad Irish Republican and Socialist constituency should articulate our objections around an agreed set of points specifically dealing with the British occupation of our country. We do not see these objections as in any way inhibative on any other objections that the proposed EU Constitution may warrant. The 32CSM has initiated contact with other republican and socialist groupings inviting them to collaborate on an agreed approach in securing a 'NO' vote against the EU Constitution. We have drafted six points of objection as a discussion leader and have included them in our contact letters. These points are intended to provoke ideas amongst the republican socialist constituency with a view to securing a definitive final draft upon which an agreed 'NO' campaign can be launched.

Whether it is called the Lisbon Treaty, Reform Treaty or whatever terminology is invoked the political intent behind it remains the same. The Treaty needs to be debated politically as much as it needs attention to its technical details

For Details:http://www.32csm.info/eucon.html

save preference

Comments (5 of 5)

Another broad campaign?

by Séamus

Tue May 06, 2008 18:59

The 32CSM has initiated contact with other republican and socialist groupings inviting them to collaborate on an agreed approach in securing a 'NO' vote against the EU Constitution.

Why not just affiliate to the CAEUC? It seems to have already begun the kind of work referred to here.

Objections on the basis on the republican position

by The Sovereign Nation - 32CSM

Tue May 06, 2008 20:42

I think the initiative was to get an agreed republican separatist position on the constitution primarily. While everyone can agree with the objections of the CAEUC, perhaps not all involved in that campaign would agree with the objections based on a republican separatist analysis. There is no reason why both initiatives cannot co exist.

by r2d2 - 543

Tue May 06, 2008 21:28

Well Sinn Fein, the IRSP and eirigi are members of caeuc.

by The Sovereign Nation

Wed May 07, 2008 01:55

PSF's objection to the proposed EU constitution was not based on partition and the denial of Irish National Sovereignty.

Don't leave out the others.

by foggy notions

Wed May 07, 2008 02:08

Neither did the IRSP or eirigi. Perhaps the 32csm , like with their unity project, should keep it with those who maintain Republican positions rather than those who just say they are Republican.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Human Rights in Ireland

Lockdown Skeptics

32CSM no to Lisbon Campaign

Comments (5 of 5)