Upcoming Events

National | Anti-Capitalism

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Fifteen Year-Old Swiss Girl Taken into Care After Parents Refuse to Consent to Course of Puberty Blo... Wed Jul 24, 2024 15:00 | Dr Frederick Attenborough
A Swiss girl has been been taken into care because her parents stopped her taking puberty blockers, breaching a ban on conversion therapy. Is this what Labour means by a "full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices"?
The post Fifteen Year-Old Swiss Girl Taken into Care After Parents Refuse to Consent to Course of Puberty Blockers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China Wed Jul 24, 2024 13:30 | Will Jones
The West's headlong rush to jettison fossil fuels and hit 'Net Zero' CO2 emissions is impoverishing us while enriching China, which is ramping up its coal-fired industry to sell us all the 'green' technology.
The post Net Zero is Impoverishing the West and Enriching China appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Threat to Democracy Wed Jul 24, 2024 11:29 | James Alexander
'Populists' like Donald Trump and Nigel Farage are a "threat to democracy", chant the mainstream media. In fact, they are just reminding our politicians what they are supposed to be doing, says Prof James Alexander.
The post The Threat to Democracy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link In the Latest Weekly Sceptic, Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Biden?s Withdrawal, Kamala Harris... Wed Jul 24, 2024 09:00 | Toby Young
In the latest Weekly Sceptic, the talking points are whether Biden was the victim of a palace coup, Kamala Harris's staggeringly bad speeches and Kim Cheatle's humiliation.
The post In the Latest Weekly Sceptic, Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Biden?s Withdrawal, Kamala Harris?s Chances and the Kim Cheatle?s Shame appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Wanted: Climate Researcher to Write Extreme Weather Just-So Stories to Serve Up to Credulous Media Wed Jul 24, 2024 07:00 | Chris Morrison
If you wondered where the MSM get all their lurid stories attributing 'extreme weather' to climate change, look no further than a new job ad for a "researcher" focused on creating alarmist propaganda, says Chris Morrison.
The post Wanted: Climate Researcher to Write Extreme Weather Just-So Stories to Serve Up to Credulous Media appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Guerilla Tactics and the National Question

category national | anti-capitalism | opinion/analysis author Sunday March 01, 2009 23:02author by J. O'Neill - an lucht oibre Report this post to the editors

A rebuke of the Socialist Party stance

The SP supports non-revolutionary figures like Chavez, while with-holding support from revolutionaries fighting to overthrow capitalism. This stance is contradictory. Working class unity is a utopian goal until the political and social forces that maintains sectarianism are dismantled.

Guerilla Tactics and the National Question - A rebuke of the Socialist Party stance

While there is no doubt our comrades in the Socialist Party harbor many progressive ideas, some blatant contradictions and just plain falsities within their political strategy must be cleared up.

First on the agenda is the almost snobbish disregard they hold for the use of guerrilla-styled armed action in the pursuit of socialist revolution. The top brass within the party have remained steadfast in their opposition to such tactics, but it is the contradiction in policy, more so than the opinion, that I have to expose. The Socialist Party maintain that they will under no circumstances support a group engaged in similar actions, believing that this tried and tested [and at times successful despite long-odds] method of resistance through time has depreciated in political value and any such group supportive of the tactic, no matter how progressive that group may be, does not deserve our support.

With the same breath the Socialist Party hierarchy speak in glowing terms of the ‘revolution’ happening in Latin America, holding Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez in particularly high esteem. There is a massive contradiction here. It is clear that Chavez is no communist and it is equally clear how the tactic of constitutionalism throughout history has never produced the desired results from a socialist revolutionary perspective. Why are we told to support a complete reformist who adheres faithfully to a proven to be failed tactic, while the same people tell us not to support truly socialist organizations because they are using a perceived to be failed tactic? ‘The day of the guerilla has passed’ they tell us, well how convenient for the trendy left, but when did the day of reformist constitutionalism arrive in a package labeled ‘REVOLUTION‘. I guess Joe Higgins would prefer FARC to surrender to the will of the corrupt government and right-wing paramilitaries. We should never forget our comrades because we don’t agree with a single tactic they use, to be so absurdly doctrinaire is ridiculous, it is the overall socialist programme that matters, within reason. It was Lenin who said that he who believes in a perfect revolution will never see one and if we rest our convictions in the hands of the contradictions displayed by the Socialist Party, I think it’s safe to say we will never see one.

‘The lesson of history shows that in the final analysis the robber baron must be dis-established by the some methods that he used to enrich himself and retain his ill-gotten gains, namely, force of arms. To this end we must organize, train, and maintain a disciplined armed force which will always be available to strike at the opportune moment’ - Seamus Costello

On the national question my issue with the Socialist Party is an obvious one I feel, that of their endorsement of the Good Friday Agreement. They called for a ‘yes’ vote but still to this day claim not to endorse that treaty, forgive me for being so black and white but if you actively call on people to support a treaty then you are endorsing it! It is not this confusion that matters however, it is the ramifications for the socialist struggle that do and they are great indeed.

This document, in simple terms, copper-fastens imperialism in Ireland, something as socialists we must oppose with every sinew in our bodies. How can a supposed revolutionary party call for such an outcome, it makes little sense, but then again most Socialist Party policies on the north are not steeped in logic, as the SP has consistently tail-ended reactionary elements within the Protestant community. The greatest enemy of our class over the years has consistently been sectarianism which by all accounts was a British importation. This document does nothing to ease sectarianism, in fact it ensures a willing breeding ground for it to thrive. It is an unforgivable position to take that the ending of the Provisional IRA’s campaign will lead to the dismantling of sectarianism in the occupied 6 counties. Sectarianism has existed for centuries in Ireland, it did not begin with the recent conflict nor will it end with it. Throughout our sectarian history there has always been one common factor: namely British Imperialism. It is not until this presence has left our shores that sectarianism can finally cease to exist.

Sectarian has been institutionalized, every ‘democratic’ polling day reduced to a mere sectarian headcount and at the behest of a so-called socialist revolutionary group. Something just doesn’t add up here. The reactionaries like the DUP and PSF love this institutionalized sectarianism, it ensures them a political lifeline for years to come and it is a monopoly we must destroy. Our methods for this are simple, mass mobilization and revolutionary leadership. And if there is an opportunity to strike a blow against imperialism or capitalism through the use of arms and it sparks off a positive chain of events for the political struggle then by all means it is an avenue we must walk down. We cannot fear our goals and we cannot be part-time socialists, it will take every ounce of our boundless energy to scrape over the finishing line.

Capitalism is a serious foe and accordingly we must be serious about what we intend to attain. We will not be put out of business by anyone, nor at any point shall we be distracted from our task by the lure of material gain. To the capitalist sympathizers within the trendy left groupings I have a clear message: there is no ceasefire in the class war and now of all times is no time to be pedantic, we can hardly expect class unity when the left can barely stomach sitting in the same room as one another. It is time to grow above egos and petty party issues and to start being loyal to what really matters, our class and our guiding theory.

Capitalism is on the ropes, but won't go down without a revolutionary programme that goes beyond economism; let us join together to deliver the knockout blow! Workers of the world unite!

author by John - N/Apublication date Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Bombings are only a factor of a guerilla war. Assasinations and ambushes are also part-in-parcel. You seem narrow-minded to think a militant campaign cannot be progressive. You need to recognize that Ireland, as a nation, is no different from any other country in the form that if we are oppressed by foreign armed forces, we have a right to pick up arms in defence/demand of our this country. Why should we comprimise our country with foreign settlers? America wouldn't do it, Russia wouldn't do it, and Ireland certainly won't!

Let the fight go on!

RIRA/32CSM

CIRA/RSF

Forward to freedom/forward to victory!

Tiocfaidh ar la!

Related Link: http://www.bebo.com/forwardtovictory
author by peter - nonepublication date Tue Mar 03, 2009 16:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Are you suggesting that a few people taking up arms now, which in an urban context in reality means planting bombs, is any way progressive? You show a complete lack of historical knowledge to the development of the armed struggle in Northern ireland (and Latin America). it didn't just happen, in many ways the NI armed struggle was defensive to begin with and was fueled by the misgovernment of the six county statelet and the British state. The offensive campaign of the Provisonal IRA came much later. A guerilla campaign plucked out of thin air without any social or political background is more akin to the border skirmishes of the 50's. All progressively minded people should be prepared to defend any popular successes won (which have a mass democratic mandate), such as the successes of Chavez, or if there was a rightwing military coup in the North, However that is different to palnting bombs which more often than not kill civilians while having no impact whatsoever politicaly. And thats not even bringing in the moral issue of killing innocent civilians when political avenues have not been attempted.

author by LcuLpublication date Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:05author address author phone Report this post to the editors

J. O'Neill provide some proof of your spurious claims about the Socialist Party. Your opinion piece is a fabrication from start to finish.

author by RedFlag32 - Republican Socialistpublication date Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:31author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The peoples yes vote for the GFA can be viewed in the same light as the peoples support for the treaty in the 20's, it was a vote for the absence of war. The people of Ireland voted in favour of the GFA because they just wanted the killings to end (and rightfully so) not because of any political ideology. To presume they did is to pander to the Unionist revisionist campaign.

In saying that, this does not mean that revolutionary organisations have the right to ignore the democratic wishes of the people and continue on a campaign that will mean more deaths. But while revolutionary organisations do not have the right to do this they have a duty to object to an aggreement which encourages sectarianism to prevail in Ulster. Most of the left in Ireland fail in this regard.

What is wrong with critically supporting the yes vote for the GFA? The Irish Republican Socialist Movement has taken such a stance. They have put an end to the armed struggle because of the peoples yes vote for the GFA (which was rightfully recognised as a vote against armed struggle and not a vote for partition) and the party continues to oppose the GFA on the merits that it entrenches sectarian voting and it strenghtens Britians rule in Ireland.

The above poster who says "As long as the majority of the electorate in Northern Ireland vote for unionists parties and declare that it is their will to remain within the UK, the partition will continue" displays a unionist revisionist attitude to partition in Ireland in that he/she completely ignores how "Nothern Ireland" was created. All the talk of democracy is forgotton when its applied to partition. I wonder would the poster think it democratic if the large section of Polish or Chineese people who live in particular sections of Dublin decided to create their own border and represent it as majoirty vote because everybody within this border agreed with it? I am not equating the Protestant class in Ulster with foriegn nationals but the Unionist Veto is based on a false majority much like the example i gave. The real majority is the majority of Ireland as a whole, and if the majority ever voted negetively for the dismantling of partition then the revolutionary party has no right to forcefully object, but it does have a duty to critically support that decision of the people.

But a decision by the majority of the people in Ireland on partition will possibly never arrive because those who supposedly represent real democracy in Ireland are pandering to the Unionist revsionist analysis of partition.

 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy