Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Parse failure for http://humanrights.ie/feed/. Last Retry Friday September 12, 2025 03:35
News Round-Up Fri Sep 12, 2025 00:55 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
A Closed Shop And Ludicrous Demands ? One Week Of Tube Strikes Thu Sep 11, 2025 19:30 | Sallust Is it any wonder Tube drivers are striking again when Sadiq Khan gave them a ?30m bribe last time they walked out? Sallust reviews a week of disruption and the depressing fact that it's going to happen again and again.
The post A Closed Shop And Ludicrous Demands ? One Week Of Tube Strikes appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Murder of Iryna Zarutska and the Pathological Race Ideology of the American Progressive Establis... Thu Sep 11, 2025 18:23 | Eugyppius The US liberal establishment is trying to hide from the dark truth that the US black population commits so many violent crimes, many Ukrainian refugees like Iryna Zarutska would be safer staying at home, says Eugyppius.
The post The Murder of Iryna Zarutska and the Pathological Race Ideology of the American Progressive Establishment appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Peter Mandelson Sacked as US Ambassador ? Piling Crisis onto Crisis for Starmer Thu Sep 11, 2025 15:33 | Will Jones Keir Starmer is fighting to survive his second crisis in a week as he sacks Peter Mandelson as US ambassador over "disgusting" Epstein emails just 24 hours after backing him and only days since Angela Rayner quit.
The post Peter Mandelson Sacked as US Ambassador ? Piling Crisis onto Crisis for Starmer appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Will Charlie Kirk?s Assassination Embolden or Further Silence Right-Thinking Young People? Thu Sep 11, 2025 13:12 | Joanna Gray Will Charlie Kirk's assassination embolden or further silence right-thinking young people, asks Joanna Gray ? as her 17 year-old son dreads going into school today to face his gloating feminist classmates.
The post Will Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Embolden or Further Silence Right-Thinking Young People? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Supposed ‘hard fight’ to secure guarantees on Lisbon Treaty: a clever tactic to mislead says McKenna
national |
eu |
press release
Monday June 22, 2009 12:26 by O. O'C - The People's Movement 0872427049

So-called legally binding guarantees which the Government claim they fought hard to secure do not change one single aspect of the Lisbon Treaty
Not one single word of the Lisbon Treaty will be altered by these guarantees, which is why they do not need to be ratified by the National Parliaments of the 27 Member States. The so called ‘legal guarantees’ are nothing more than an interpretation by EU Heads of State as to what they think the Lisbon Treaty means. However, if the Lisbon Treaty comes into force, it will be the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg which will interpret Lisbon. The EU Court is the only body authorised under the European Treaties to interpret the Treaties themselves and decide how they should be applied. The political decision and agreement of a particular group of EU Prime Ministers and Presidents, which is what we are being presented with, cannot and will not decide what Lisbon means. Supposedly ‘hard fight’ by Ireland to secure guarantees on Lisbon Treaty – a clever tactic to mislead voters, says McKenna
Speaking on the assurances obtained by the Irish Government on the Lisbon Treaty in Dublin today, Patricia McKenna, Chairperson of the Peoples Movement one of the leading groups campaigning for rejection of the treaty said, “the so-called legally binding guarantees which the Government claim they fought hard to secure do not change one single aspect of the Lisbon Treaty all they do is reiterate the same assurances given by EU Heads of State during the first referendum. These assurances given by the Yes side were not enough to convince people to vote in favour of the treaty first time around and will be dismissed by the voters with the same mistrust in any second referendum.”
McKenna who was speaking at a joint press conference with the Peace and Neutrality Alliance went on to say:
Not one single word of the Lisbon Treaty will be altered by these guarantees, which is why they do not need to be ratified by the National Parliaments of the 27 Member States. The so called ‘legal guarantees’ are nothing more than an interpretation by EU Heads of State as to what they think the Lisbon Treaty means. However, if the Lisbon Treaty comes into force, it will be the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg which will interpret Lisbon. The EU Court is the only body authorised under the European Treaties to interpret the Treaties themselves and decide how they should be applied. The political decision and agreement of a particular group of EU Prime Ministers and Presidents, which is what we are being presented with, cannot and will not decide what Lisbon means.
The ‘Decision’ of the European Council that certain provisions of the Lisbon Treaty mean specific things is just an agreement between 27 Heads of State as to what they believe to be the case. This ‘Decision’ is not an international treaty between States because it does not require and will not go through the ratification process of all 27 Member States through approval in their National Parliaments. This is the normal process for ratifying international treaties and it is clear that without such a legally binding ratification process the ‘legal guarantees’ do not have this legal status.
The run-up to and presentation of these so-called legal guarantees is a deliberate attempt to divert attention away from the contents of the Lisbon Treaty which will remain unchanged in a second referendum. The hype surrounding the supposedly hard fight that the Irish Government faced to secure these guarantees is a clever way of getting people to believe that Ireland after a long struggle managed to achieve something. But all they have achieved is a regurgitation of the Yes side’s arguments endorsed by the EU Heads of State.
Even promises of ‘Protocols’ at a future date are irrelevant because once the new EU established under Lisbon comes into force then no Protocol can pull back from what Lisbon has established and it will be the EU Court of Justice that will decide what the Treaty means once it comes into force.
Ends
For further information phone: 0872427049, Patricia McKenna
|