Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger Tue Jun 17, 2025 07:00 | Laurie Wastell
A significant proportion of live rape gang cases involve asylum seekers and non-UK nationals. This bombshell finding of the Casey report piles outrage upon outrage and will fuel public anger, says Laurie Wastell.
The post The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Tue Jun 17, 2025 01:38 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Big Brother Lives Next Door Mon Jun 16, 2025 19:00 | Matthew Corrigan
The UK claims to be part of the free West, yet we have more CCTV cameras than anywhere else in the world. Completely enamoured of surveillance, even our bloody doorbells are filming us, says Matthew Corrigan.
The post Big Brother Lives Next Door appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds Mon Jun 16, 2025 17:30 | Will Jones
The Establishment has been in "denial" over the ethnicity of grooming gangs and repeatedly relied on flawed data to dismiss claims about Asian grooming gangs as "sensationalised, biased or untrue", a report has found.
The post Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat Mon Jun 16, 2025 15:29 | Toby Young
We're having another fund-raising drive at the Daily Sceptic, so please make a donation if you value our work. We're also launching a new Substack ? the Climate Skeptic ??that you can also support.
The post Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 5 4 3 2 1I really shouldn't be having to explain your sort of political system but perhaps you are putting blame in the wrong place.?
It is inherent in the form "parliamentary democracy" that unless some single party has a majority, and that depends on the people, not the parties, that "the govenrment" has to be formed by a coalition of parties. That means that representatives form the coalition "in power" will sometimes have to support measures that they and their party would not support were they:
a) a majority party able to rule on their own
b) not part of the governing coalition.
Let's look more closely at "b" (since "a" clearly is not an option at the present time).
When/why is this choice made (when is it the right choice)
a) One's party is about what is so different from what most of the people want (one's supporters are a small minority) that the whole exercise of running is simply to give a VOICE to this difference. To represent the interest groups supporting this party with at least words even though lacking enough clout to get ANYTHING that the people of these interest groups want. In other words, a form of protest.
b) There are other parties "in opposition" with whom with with a few more seats won collectively it might be possible to replace the ruling coalition with another coalition AND one has some reasonable expectation that in this coaltion there would be less times having to support measures that one's own party finds distasteful.
See -- the problem doesn't ever go away entirely. Not unless "the people" become surprisingly unified, everybody wants the same thing. Highly unlikely.
What I am saying here is that you have to evaluate "supporting measures that the party would not/should not want to support" against alternatives. ARE there alternative coaltion possibilities that would reduce the amount of thime that this was happening. Or is this a situation where unfortunately the best of the bad? Notice I am NOT arguing that it is, just that you should be trying to make the case that there IS some better alternative. Otherwise what you are arguing against is not the behavior of this party but the sort of "democratic system" you choose.
The democratic electecd Dail Eireann runs Ireland.
Not......self servig,....well paid . public sector workers.
.
.
http://soundcloud.com/ihasaflavour/fuck-you-deputy-stag...er1-1
Should be called the "Yellow Party"
A wretched man contorted, bending over backword to justify his unjustifable actions.
I have no sympathy for these losers.