Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Mon Apr 21, 2025 00:53 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Trans Activists at London Demo Called for TERFs to be Hanged, and Defaced Seven Statues, Including N... Sun Apr 20, 2025 19:00 | Toby Young Trans rights activists held a demo in London yesterday to protest Wednesday's Supreme Court decision and defaced seven statues, including Nelson Mandela's and Millicent Fawcett's.
The post Trans Activists at London Demo Called for TERFs to be Hanged, and Defaced Seven Statues, Including Nelson Mandela?s appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Guardian Ditches ?Settled Science? for ?Climate Justice? in Effort to Avoid Reality Sun Apr 20, 2025 17:00 | Charles Rotter In the Guardian's latest climate gobbledegook, Friederike Otto redefines climate change as a "crisis of justice", focusing on moralising and social justice rather than the science, argues Charles Rotter.
The post Guardian Ditches ?Settled Science? for ?Climate Justice? in Effort to Avoid Reality appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Banks and Business are Talking Sense on Climate at Last. But it Must not be Just Talk Sun Apr 20, 2025 15:00 | Richard Eldred Corporations and banks are shifting from "green-washing" to "green-hushing", but unless this marks real change, it's just more empty promises, warns Bjorn Lomborg.
The post Banks and Business are Talking Sense on Climate at Last. But it Must not be Just Talk appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Final Proof That the Labour Party I Once Loved is Hopelessly out of Touch? Sun Apr 20, 2025 13:00 | Richard Eldred The Labour Party's failure to align with legal and public sentiment on women's rights and trans issues, has rendered it hopelessly out of touch, says women's rights advocate Professor Jo Phoenix in the Mail.
The post ?Final Proof That the Labour Party I Once Loved is Hopelessly out of Touch? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Another repression of the animal liberation movement?
international |
animal rights |
opinion/analysis
Sunday October 24, 2010 00:33 by Mi cke y - !Liberate!

At the end of August Time.com published an article containing a controversial opinion of co-founder of the most popular organization fighting (supposedly) for animal rights – Ingrid Newkirk. Mrs President, said, inter alia, that “Absolute purists should be living in a cave.” In the ranks of the activists PETA has been regarded as the organization which in no way improve the lot of animals. After another raid someone may even be tempted to declare that the organization becomes harmful, because denying ethical considerations justifies the same industry which is responsible for the holocaust of the animals. This in turn leads to the construction of the belief that everything is really okay, we should eat animals, we just need to kill them a bit more gently. This way, Burger King customers will soon become defenders of the animals. Anyway Gary L. Francione issued an excellent response to Mrs. Newkirk views. I urge you to read it to understand fully what I mean. On the one hand, we have an apparent desire to make changes represented by the creators of popular NGOs and on the second hand we observe reinforcing the repression against those who try to make real changes. This is particularly evident in the United States, where not so long ago, Walter Bond was arrested, accused of carrying out direct action under the Animal Liberation Front. By the way as it turned out that FBI informant, who delivered information about Walter Bond, was his brother. Shortly after the FBI raid took place at the house of well-known activist Peter Young, who runs a website dedicated to animal rights Voice of the Voiceless. And from other reports, we can learn about the secret meeting of the companies involved in violence against animals, which is to be devoted to “extremists fighting for animal rights.” To make matters worse a few days ago it emerged that Monsanto hired a Blackwater, which is responsible among others for the crimes committed in Iraq, to spying on the eco and animal rights movements. The measures taken by businesses are becoming more repressive, which may indicate a growing fear of the consequences of activists actions. Especially, thanks to publicity they gain, animal rights issues get to the commercial media, hitting the mass audience. And this is a problem for companies that are part of the industry exploiting animals. They are happy to condone the existence of such organizations as conformist PETA , but do everything they can to harm those who strive for true liberation of animals. These companies are very afraid that their customers can see the truth about the production of food, clothing or other products of animal origin. Less consumption means lower profits. And thanks to the support of the state officials they criminalize those who fight for a right cause, accusing them of absurd allegations (eg, terrorism), at same time pursuing the policy of absolute cruelty to other beings.
Increased repression is often a symbol of the growing strength of the movement. Similar mechanisms can be found in history or even in modern times (the Zapatistas, Greek anarchists). Capitalist thinking instilled to managers and employees of big business is not able to understand a completely different thought, based on ethics, not a selfish point of view. This does not mean, however, that this thought may be stifled by intimidation or pressure from the state forces. The more repression, the more resistance. The more terror, the greater will to act. This in turn may result in increasing the strength and commitment of the people in the struggle for animal liberation. In the broad outline, also in a political struggle, which I personally link to the animals issues as the whole movement must become a part of it. Social revolution (in which the animal rights are the key issue) instead of ineffective reforms or welfare can ensure the animals freedom and respect.
Sources:
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/links/p3443/a...n.pdf
http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/ingrid-newkirk-on-p...iple/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/alf-lone-wolf-arrest...torm/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/breaking-fbi-raids-u...time/
http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.org/leaked-document-reve...reat/
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=201009182110...05427
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2You know perfectly well that people don't go from a condition of little or no awareness directly to radical / revolutionary
PETA, by playing the corporations own media and celebrity games, are achieving awareness of animal issues on a large scale. Because of this, they are considered a much bigger threat than ALF to the status quo. That is why they are targetted
That is why vested interests would like nothing more than for PETA to be rejected by other animal rights groups. Divide and conquer is the game of the corporations. Don't fall for it. Many of those people who PETA gets through to will go on to a deeper awareness.
There is no reason why all groups can't proceed on all levels in parallel. There is no reason why different approaches can't be tried. Not everyone is amenable to a radical or revolutionary approach. In fact very few are. Largely because of the very tools used successfully by corporate interests. Tools that PETA is now using against them, and quite successfully.
No, Not everyone is amenable to to radical or revolutionary change. (The small number that are can be easily smeared and neutralised.) It's naive to think they are.
Or perhaps it's not so naive? Perhaps it's something else at work here?
I think most of your comments is correct. Only one thing. It depends on what you define as a revolutionary change. Contemporary revolutionary thought puts a large extent on education, not a sudden change, which could lead to disaster. Only conscious society can accept radical changes.
The thing with PETA is, that yes, they managed to attract the attention of people using photos with naked chicks or Pamela Anderson involvment in their campaigns but at the end of day it didn't give expected effects. The welfare reforms have failed. Also you can't be against torture, while accepting a lighter form of torture. As Francione's said:
"The reforms that are promoted by PETA and the other new welfarist groups for the most part do not provide significant welfare benefits for animals. They just represent a different form of torture. Waterboarding someone on a bare board and waterboarding them on a padded board is still waterboarding. "
However, of course, I agree with you, there should be different methods of struggle against the exploitation of animals, not just direct action.