Violence Abroad, Cutbacks at Home...

national | miscellaneous | news report

Saturday January 25, 2003 02:17

by sa - Socialist Alternative

thesocialistalternative at yahoo dot co dot uk

No Blood For Oil.

For once every one seems to agree. Public opinion across the World is firmly against the war. 400,000 have marched in London; and over 200,000 gathered in Washington DC and across the States against attacks on Iraq. Here opinion polls show a majority stance against our government having any involvement in this war.

Yet its still going ahead. Nothing seems to affect the determination of Bush and Blair to make war. To find the best way to stop this war, we need to look at why its happening. After September 11th, Bushâ€™s government, the most unpopular in American history, supported by less than a quarter of the electorate seized the chance to impose its agenda in the name of â€˜fighting terrorismâ€™. A tax cut that benefited the top 10% was forced through congress and legislation rolling back civil liberties introduced. There have been drastic increases in military budget. Anyone opposing these measures has been labelled â€˜pro-terrorist.â€™
The same thing happened in Europe. The EU is attempting to criminalize protest by defining â€˜terroristâ€™ as anyone who opposes the political or economic structures of their society. Tony Blair has threatened to use â€˜anti-terroristâ€™ legislation to break a strike by fire fighters-the same people who would be expected to risk their lives if terrorist ever did strike London.
So the â€˜war on terrorâ€™ has been manipulated for the benefit of wealthy elites on both sides of the Atlantic. The US State Department has said that the goal of this war should be to impose US Style â€˜free enterpriseâ€™ around the world., with low corporate taxes, no trade unions, and minimal spending on health and education-the same agenda being promoted by the IMF and World Bank.
Seen in this context the war on Iraq makes perfect sense. The US government is afraid its ally, the Saudi dictatorship may collapse, threatening â€˜stabilityâ€™ and the interests of US Oil companies ( Bush and Cheney both made their fortunes in the oil industry). By establishing a permanent military presence in Iraq with a puppet regime in place. America will control 10% of all known oil reserves, while also being in an excellent position to attack any Arab states that wonâ€™t toe the line (not to mention the Palestinians). If it succeeds in Iraq, the US Military will set its sights even further. The next target may be Latin America. Already members of the Bush Administration have spoken of the â€˜second axis of evilâ€™: Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez of Venezula, and the Brazilian president Lulu, all sworn opponents of the neo-liberal agenda. US Military intervention is being used to defend corporate globalisation. If we want to oppose militarism and aggression, itâ€™s essential we oppose the Thatcherite social policies promoted by governments in Europe and Latin America. Since the protests against the World Trade Organisation in Seattle three years ago, a movement for global justice has developed and scared our rulers shitless. This movement is the main target of â€˜anti-terroristâ€™ legislation, not Al Queda. And itâ€™s the only force capable of stopping Bush and the war mongers.
During the Nice Referendum, our government assured us that Irish Neutrality was safe in their hands. But now theyâ€™ve done everything possible to support Bush, allowing warplanes to land at Shannon and supporting the US at the UN Security Council. This is not an accident. Fianna Fail and the PDs look to America for ideological inspiration. US Conservatives have praised their neo-liberal economic policies as an example to the world. With friends like that, Irish neutrality is an embarrassment. Over the last few years, our neutrality has been gradually eroded, so we can be eased into NATO or an EU Militarised alliance. This is not just morally unjust: it harms every Irish person not lucky enough to form part of that charmed circle with foreign bank accounts who benefit from McCreevys tax cuts. Already the government has spent a quarter of a billion beefing up the armed forces for participation in the RRF. There was no question of slashing military expenditure in the last budget; everyone affected by cutbacks in social spending is paying the price so that Irelands elite can join the club of countries with a militarised foreign policy. Its no surprise then, that , that Cowen and Ahern haven't done anything to oppose war on Iraq. If we want to shift our governments policy, we have to make them pay a heavy political price for supporting Bush-and the best way to do that is to make the connection between cutbacks at home and violence abroad.

save preference

Comments (3 of 3)

maybe they will change their policies after the first anthrax outbreak?

by quite agree.

Sat Jan 25, 2003 10:54

Or will it be "hushed up"?
The young men on false passports with maps of London in their bags and cheap and easy to find equipment in their bedrooms arrested this week in France, Catalonia and London wished to fight a "holy war" against Europe and the USA. They had already told Europe and the USA that any attack on Iraq would be considered an attack on Islam.

ERHA, ECAHB, SWAHB, NAHB or EHSS.
are the authorities in Ireland who ought be supplying the Irish people with vaccines.

Or will it all just blow over?

vitally important and dangerous information

by the truth is out there

Sun Jan 26, 2003 23:36

Quiet agree is correct, but the media and the 'revolutionary parties' churches etc are strangely silent on the risks our asshole politicans are exposing their citizens to by flogging off our neutrality and shannon.

justification

by antrophe

Mon Jan 27, 2003 13:49

if one of the justifications for the 'war on terror' remains the idea of imminent terrorist attacks on the western free world and supposed democracies, then by appealing for an end to the build up to war by using the same argument as a justifaction of an antiwar stance, namely, that we dont want to risk the wrath of a terrorist attack, something like the crap Labour and the Greens have been peddling, labour in particular doesnt seem to have a prolem with the war but more so with the legislative odditiy, that is war plans in shannon, a breech of the constituion is there concern and they seek to remedy it, not war.
Lets be clear, the war on terror is a fallacy, 'terror' is just a word and you cant have a war on a concept, thats what bush and blair are doing, 'terror' is a justifaction and albeit a cliched statement, we need to recognise who the real terrorists are.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Public Inquiry

Human Rights in Ireland

Violence Abroad, Cutbacks at Home...

Comments (3 of 3)