New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Why is the Covid Inquiry Still Not Recommending Research into the Effectiveness of Lockdowns? Tue Aug 06, 2024 13:15 | Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
The UK Covid Inquiry, at great expense, has issued recommendations on preparing for the 'next pandemic'. But there is still no call for research into the effectiveness of lockdowns, say Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson.
The post Why is the Covid Inquiry Still Not Recommending Research into the Effectiveness of Lockdowns? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Peterson vs Peter Pan Tue Aug 06, 2024 11:06 | James Alexander
"Tune in, turn on, grow up!" Jordan Peterson tells Joe Rogan it's time to put the permanent adolescence of the 1960s behind us. It's Peterson vs Peter Pan, says Prof James Alexander.
The post Peterson vs Peter Pan appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Good Morning Britain Branded ?Embarrassing in the Extreme? as Ed Balls Interviews His Wife Home Secr... Tue Aug 06, 2024 09:00 | Will Jones
Good Morning Britain was branded "embarrassing in the extreme" by viewers after Ed Balls interviewed his wife Home Secretary Yvette Cooper as she defended the Government's handling of the riots.
The post Good Morning Britain Branded “Embarrassing in the Extreme” as Ed Balls Interviews His Wife Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to Defend Handling of Riots appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Why Were We Edited Out of Channel 5?s Lucy Letby Documentary? Tue Aug 06, 2024 07:00 | Dr Norman Fenton
Prof Norman Fenton and Dr Scott McLachlan were edited out of Channel 5's Lucy Letby documentary on Sunday night. Their crime? Expressing forbidden views online. It shows how pernicious cancel culture has become, says Dr Fenton.
The post Why Were We Edited Out of Channel 5?s Lucy Letby Documentary? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Tue Aug 06, 2024 01:13 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Netanyahu soon to appear before the US Congress? It will be decisive for the suc... Thu Jul 04, 2024 04:44 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°93 Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:49 | en

offsite link Will Israel succeed in attacking Lebanon and pushing the United States to nuke I... Fri Jun 28, 2024 14:40 | en

offsite link Will Netanyahu launch tactical nuclear bombs (sic) against Hezbollah, with US su... Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:09 | en

offsite link Will Israel provoke a cataclysm?, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Jun 25, 2024 06:59 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Call for Revision of Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty

category international | anti-war / imperialism | news report author Tuesday February 07, 2006 18:09author by Kathy Sinnott Report this post to the editors

Non Proliferation Treat urgently in need of revision

It was recently discovered that the physics department basement in UCC houses nuclear material. That is not necessarily unusual. Hospitals and labs also keep small quantities of radioactive materials even in this country. What is unusual is that UCC has a dismantled nuclear reactor, a small amount of plutonium, and two and a half tonnes of uranium. And they have been there for twenty years

One of the ironies of finding such a large amount of nuclear materials in a UCC storeroom guarded by no more than campus security, is that it was Ireland that instigated the NPT, Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Or maybe it wasn’t an irony. Maybe it is because of the consistently anti-nuclear stance of the Irish people that we could retain this nuclear store and never worry that we would use it to develop a nuclear program of our own.

Of course, we weren’t going to turn it into a nuclear bomb or even a power station, it was just a White Elephant given by President Regan that was shelved like Aunt Berthas wedding gift. Can’t give it away, but can’t use it.

I think it's great that it meant so little to us. Of course because it means a lot to others especially terrorist, I can also understand that it needed better storage and protection than our casual attitude gave it.

So how has our Non Proliferation Treaty fared. I say “our” with some sense of pride because it was Ireland that presented to the UN General Assembly the resolution "Prevention of the Wider Dissemination of Nuclear Weapons" in 1961 that led to its creation. Considering the tense atmosphere in international relations and the nuclear stockpiling of the1960's I think we can be reasonably content with the performance of the NPT to date. It was quite an achievement to get the UN General Assembly to unanimously approve such a resolution.

It undoubtedly has done well. It held the line on new countries for a long while and it reduced the number of existing nuclear warheads. Of course nuclear arms did not disappear but who knows at the rate things were escalating in 1970 maybe it has saved our lives. It has not stopped India or Pakistan who were both given the same nuclear starter kit as Ireland by then president Ronald Reagan. Nor has it stopped Israel. But those three are not signatories of the NPT.

Now we have a new problem. Iran signed the Treaty but now exploits its loopholes. The Head of State seem to think the restriction is old fashioned and inappropriate to their situation and ambitions. The country that is most anxious to limit Iran, The United States itself, an original signatory of the NPT will not ratify the new Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and wants to start working on new types of Nuclear weapons. This makes it much more difficult for it to lead a moral crusade against Iranian Proliferation.

Many countries are concerned though by the fact that by exploiting grey areas within the NPT, Iran will be able to process their own weapons grade uranium or even plutonium. This loophole was left in the treaty because long time signatories like the US and France still needed refined nuclear fuel.

The difficulty arises when these loopholes are exploited by a country not in the 'weapons club' already.

So, what now? Maybe its time for a new treaty. One without loopholes, one which requires everyone who has nuclear weapons to agree to total disarmament. We cannot hold less stable or less democratic nations to a higher standard if we are not willing to do so ourselves. The idea that a treaty could be written to stop anyone developing a nuclear weapons program except those who already had, was always a fudge. The cold war is over, the use of nukes is now unthinkable, and if they do get into the wrong hands, 'the west' will have to share some of that blame.

It's time for a new treaty which does away with these weapons entirely. They are too dangerous and too destructive, they are relics of a stand off we survived and the only way to keep them from the worst hands is to agree to keep them from all hands. We need a new treaty and who better than Ireland to make it happen.......Again

author by Seán Ryanpublication date Fri Feb 10, 2006 00:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

A couple of links:

Indy story on DU in shannon:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/74089

Story by me in Indy, contains loads of DU info.
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/74048

Story of DU laden plane crash in Canada, lots of facts and figures.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/depleted_uranium.html

Russian site, with a helluva lot of DU information and uses.
http://www.aeronautics.ru/archive/du-watch/us_gov_about...u.htm

The public are very much unaware how plentiful DU is, and the risks associated with it. Admittedly when it is burnt it becomes incredibly dangerous and toxic. However, even if it remains in a state that hasn't been oxidised, it presents significant, toxicological and radiological dangers, especially to children who live a hand to mouth existence.

Sláinte,
Seán Ryan

author by staying powerpublication date Thu Feb 09, 2006 22:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Sean is correct. A few years ago there was a similar concern at Stansted, following the crash of a cargo jet that had a DU tail weight.

author by Slpublication date Thu Feb 09, 2006 20:06author address author phone Report this post to the editors

DU was (may still be, not sure) used for many years to make counterwieghts for the tails of some aircraft. Can't remember which models off the top of my head. Not as dangerous here as in weapons because it's one big lump - but if it burns it's nasty! (Search for info on the crash into a residential neighbourhood near Amsterdam Airport for example)

author by Terencepublication date Thu Feb 09, 2006 16:51author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Sean you say:

>Don't forget that DU (depleted uranium) is a common component found abundantly in the Republic.
I am not too sure what you mean by that, cos other than the Uranium described in UCC, I don't think there is any other source. It is true that there are some Uranium ores in Ireland, but I am not sure how rich they are in Uranium and they definitely would not be a source of DU since you would have to do a lot of processing to get at it.

And second you say:
>..harvest approximately 1,500 kg's of DU from an older boeing 747

There's no DU in a boeing 747 that I am aware of. It would be an unusual metal to put in a commerical airplane, considering Uranium is a very dense and heavy metal and in the manufacture of airplanes, one always would try to use the lightest metals that you can to save on fuel consumption.

author by Seán Ryanpublication date Tue Feb 07, 2006 20:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Methinks Bertie should look into securtity, for the D.I.Y. nuke/dirty bomb. Tis funny that Bertie et al got so upset about WMD's possibly being in Iraq, when just down the road a few yards we ourselves had WMD components.

Maybe we need to call in UN arms inspectors, and call for UN sanctions against ourselves, until we have accounted for all WMD's and WMD manufacturing facilities in the Republic.

Don't forget that DU (depleted uranium) is a common component found abundantly in the Republic. Eg, the Average terrorist could harvest approximately 1,500 kg's of DU from an older boeing 747. You'd make quite a few 'dirty bombs,' with that, with little or no knowledge whatsoever.

Thanks Kathy,
Seán

author by Eoinpublication date Tue Feb 07, 2006 18:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Remember when the US mission to the UN stole the 4,000 page report submitted to the UNSC by Iraq, detailing over twenty years of arms deals and weapons development... Everyone else at the UNSC was outraged... Everyone, that is, except Ireland.

We didn't want to see the pages filtered by the US, and didn't even want to know what they contained, said our ambassador to the UN, as we wouldn't want to come across any information to do with the development of nuclear weapons by accident -- oh the horror! -- Which would be a breach of our NPT obligations. America's representative at the time, Negroponte, didn't even stoop to our government's level of contempt for the truth. "Yeh, so what" was his reaction.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy