Upcoming Events

Mayo | Environment

no events match your query!

New Events

Mayo

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link US Gives Weapons to Taiwan for Free, The... Fri May 03, 2024 03:55 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Russia Has 17 Percent More Defense Jobs ... Tue Apr 30, 2024 11:56 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.  We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below). 

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Julian Assange is finally free ! Tue Jun 25, 2024 21:11 | indy

offsite link Stand With Palestine: Workplace Day of Action on Naksa Day Thu May 30, 2024 21:55 | indy

offsite link It is Chemtrails Month and Time to Visit this Topic Thu May 30, 2024 00:01 | indy

offsite link Hamburg 14.05. "Rote" Flora Reoccupied By Internationalists Wed May 15, 2024 15:49 | Internationalist left

offsite link Eddie Hobbs Breaks the Silence Exposing the Hidden Agenda Behind the WHO Treaty Sat May 11, 2024 22:41 | indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Councillors vote for Shell road

category mayo | environment | news report author Tuesday March 11, 2008 18:10author by Rudiger Report this post to the editors

A rundown of a Mayo County Council where councillors voted to help Shell build their proposed experimental pipeline.
Here's where the road ends
Here's where the road ends

At a Mayo County Council (MCC) meeting yesterday, councillors voted against the wishes of a considerable number of the local residents of the area to allow the council to expand a road specifically for the use of Shell.
The motion was carried by 17 votes to 3, which will allow the council to accept €3m from Shell, Statoil & Marathon to widen and strengthen a road from the refinery gates directly to the proposed landfall site.

The first to jump to his feet in support of the motion was Cllr Johnny Mee (Labour) who spoke of the need to facilitate the job creation in Mayo and the road should go ahead in the quickest possible time. He stated that “it must be hard on the industrialists” given all the objections that seem to be going in about everything. He proposed the motion that the road be given council permission.

MCC Director of Services Peter Hynes then gave a brief rundown on the divide of the 32 submissions (involving over 140 people) that had been received regarding the road expansion. He stated that 3 of the submissions were for the road, and of the remaining submissions, half were over individual property concerns and the other half were environmental or safety concerns. It should be noted that among the submissions was one that was signed by 111 people from the area, which raised questions on the purpose, lack of consultation, safety and environmental impact of the road. Mr Hynes stated that NPWS and the Fisheries Board had addressed the environmental issues raised, while the individual property concerns could be dealt with as the project was going on. He also stated that this road was not “absolutely essential” to the Corrib Gas project and that it could go ahead without the road upgrade. He stated that it was the council who convinced Shell to do the road expansion, as the council felt it would be preferable to upgrade the road rather than fix the road

The next councillor to speak was Cllr McGuinness (FG) who seconded Cllr Mees’ proposal “with gusto”. In one of the most maddening of the speeches made, he spoke about how SEPIL (Shell Ireland) had initially handled the whole process badly by abusing people, trespassing on land and putting people into jail. However he said that we were a Christian society and that as the “perpetrators” had said they were wrong and that we should accept they’re act of contrition as these things were in the past. He also stated that the Corrib Partners were now putting right these past wrongs.

Next to speak was Cllr Gerry Coyle (FG) from Belmullet, who spoke broadly in favour of the road but wanted it extended as far as Barr na Tra as at present “the road is totally for Shell”. He also stated that the pipeline or landfall facility hadn’t got planning and so the road was pre-emptive. However he still subsequently voted for the road expansion. Three other councillors (including Cllrs McNamara & Holmes) spoke in favour of the road.

In the only clear speech against the motion Cllr Gerry Murray (SF) stated that he thought it very strange indeed to see “the Norwegian government funding roads in North West Mayo”. He also stated that in order for Local Agenda 21 to be fully complied with proper consultation with the local people of the area should happen. He said that while the people of Erris are pro-gas and pro-development, that the Shell spin is incorrectly characterising the concerns of the local people. He also stated that An Bord Pleanala Senior Planning Inspector Kevin Moore who nobody could claim is anti-development had initially found against the proposed Corrib Gas project. However it was only with the intervention of Bertie Ahern into the resubmitted planning application that had got the project passed. Cllr Murry then called for the deal to be renegotiated stating that while the “Norwegian government are stakeholders, our government are servant boys”.

Cllr Tim Quinn (FF) from Belmullet also spoke and stated that the number of submissions amazed him. He then put forward a motion to have the council delay its decision for a month in order for more consultation to be held with the local community as an act of good will and compromise. Cllr Chambers (FF) also spoke in favour of Cllr Quinns’ motion saying that he didn’t think it was unfair to give another 4 weeks for consultation.

On this point Peter Hynes stated that he didn’t think a month postponement would make any difference. He also said that his “understanding was that it [the funding for the road] might not be there” if there was a months delay, and that the delay could put the road project at risk. Mr Hynes also stated that he was offended with the assertion in some of the submissions that MCC would damage the environment and castigated what he called the “self appointed gurus” for their interference.

The vote then took place and was easily passed with only Cllrs Quinn, Murray and Chambers voting against.

Speaking after the meeting, local hostel owner Betty Schult stated that she "resented the previously public road being basically handed over to Shell for they're personal use and using council workers as Shell subcontractors"

Just a number of observations that I have is that even though now Mayo County Council have stated that the funding for the road is coming from Shell & Co initially this was not clear. The source of the funding was not stated in any of MCC’s initial planning applications and the first place this was stated that I am aware of, is in Shell’s response to some of the submissions. In response to one of the submissions MCC state “the regulations do not require the notice to state the source of the funding for a project”. To me it seems that if Mayo County Council were even slightly genuine in their claim to be interested in community consultation they would be more forthcoming to a community which already has immense distrust for them. It also begs the questions what other State agencies have financial dealings with Shell and what are they.
Peter Hynes also stated that they have been discussing the road expansion for nearly 12 months with Shell now. Seeing that the pipeline options were only publicly revealed in June 07 this means that council were discussing a road upgrade for a pipeline that not only hadn’t gone through planning permission but also the various options hadn’t been revealed to the public. Now not all the revealed pipeline options in June went through Glengad so were those other options just put in for the hell of it?
MCC also stated with regard to this application that they have “complied fully with the Aarhus Convention”. However this is patently untrue, as they have not engaged in any dialogue with concerned people regarding this road. Last Friday a meeting took place between Pat Commons, MCCs Local Agenda 21 officer and a small number of locals however this meeting discussed what his role was rather than any aspect of the road. A further meeting was sought by the locals to discuss the road however will not happen until April sometime.

Although it won’t be displayed in any glossy Shell literature or probably even media, it should be noted that last week over 100 people were let go from the Bellanaboy site. It seems that since Shell had their PR blitz about 2 weeks ago we are now into the decline phase of employment of Bellanaboy. Also according to a local councilor who made enquires, of the 25 long-term technical staff that are currently being trained only 2 are from the Erris region.
At the Shell operated Bacton gas refinery in Norfolk, England during a recent gas explosion the 46 workers were thankfully safely evacuated. This is one of the largest gas refineries in the UK and still only 46 workers on the refinery at the time of the explosion. Already around 35 jobs are going to be moved from the Bellanaboy area because of the refinery so the idea that Bellanaboy is going to provide loads of long-term jobs is false. And what is the cost of these few jobs!!!!!

Related Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/norfolk/7270397.stm
author by ebpublication date Tue Mar 11, 2008 18:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

What did you expect from MCC, they need the sHELL money to build their road for them. Ireland has no money left for projects like this, we all know where it has gone. from celtic tiger to mangy moggy. How many councillors are getting rich off this.

author by alcedo - fledgling mountain foss publication date Wed Mar 12, 2008 19:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

well what do you expect as a result of the extortion, corruption that has seeped into our government .If this is a gaeltacht speaking area , then the only way to ensure protection of the language , ensure protection of the landscape/ecology, ensure protection of the rural community identity, is by using the existing leuropean legislation , such as EU Habitats Directi ve, (Natura 2000 club) , The Birds Directive, Ramsar, Convention etc -be prepared to make a formal complaint to the Legal Afairs (commission ) all the way to the European Court. To be specific why was there not an EIA (EIS) CONDUCTED for this road and all optional roads. Its a bit like the Tara disaster .
In the gaeltacht areas such as Carraroe in Conemara -the irish language will loose out to devlopment that will only support services to english speaking (non- irish) influex. Dilution of native population as in Carraroe Connemara which is the fastest growing town in co Galway Its extermeties already encroaching onto ecologically scietific SAC zones. (they even have the Sea Cucuber Plant which is under threat in the Gallapigo Islands (for the Japaneese Market )see www.galwaycoco.ie - Amendment /Material Contravention to Gaeltacht Draft County Development Plan and the Strategic Enviroonmnetl Assessment . It applies to everywhere in Ireland You must ask yourself is the money worth the loss. The loss of the Sea Eagles in Kerry says a lot for the Kerryman ( good for football but will contribute nothing after that)-they are trying to build a gas station inTarbert -that will be more exposed than Shell .
One last thing get rid of the councillors, they should have nothing to do with the planning system.
In the end I suppose as Joe Keennedy in his article last Sunday Indo Country Matters -these islands will be but life rafts for the millions of refugees that will come with global warming and meltdown in general.
slan agus god help us all (not just Mayo)
Hess

author by martin kingpublication date Thu Mar 13, 2008 17:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is standard practice across the country that developers pay the council for roads and services to serve their developements, i.e. sewerage and roads. Just thought you should know.

author by Hesspublication date Thu Mar 13, 2008 17:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Hess , could you be a little clearer with you point? Eagles what about these eagles?

author by Fearbolg - S2Spublication date Fri Mar 14, 2008 00:56author address author phone Report this post to the editors


Is this true about big job cuts at Bellinaboy? If so, can we hear more?

author by Eanonn O'COILEA'IN - Free State Of Irelandpublication date Fri Mar 14, 2008 02:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

So when is this Highway to hell begin? Are the people in charge, out of their minds.This area were they want to make this road is one of the oldest coasts in all of Europe and has at least 10 faults, where the land has split, in some places as much 20 -30 feet since the last landslide, The coast, were this road is to be built, is being eroded every day by the currents of the bay, which is one of the strongest in all of Ireland and beyond. The photograph is of a working refinery which has fires, leaks, and explosion because raw gas is very unsafe at it's best, never mind 83 KMS of some of the strongest currents in the world,. Also do the splits just stop at the waters edge? I think not! 9 KMS of road, you can try, but my belief is on that you will never build it, The mountain road is very unstable. You want to go back to the drawing board and deceide wheather you really want to destroy an area of great IRISH CULTURE & TRADITION, never mind it's PEOPLE

IT'S NOT TO LATE TO STOP THIS DESTRUCTION
IT'S NOT TO LATE TO STOP THIS DESTRUCTION

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy